Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I can unterstand why because the integration over Grassman variables has to be translational invariant too, one has

$$ \int d\theta = 0 $$


$$ \int d\theta \theta = 1 $$

but I dont see where the rule for this double integration

$$ \int d^2 \theta \bar{\theta}\theta = -2i $$

comes from.

So can somebody explain to me how this is motivated and/or derived?

share|cite|improve this question
Is the last integral supposed to read something like $\int d^2\!\theta \, \bar{\theta}\theta$? – Olof Apr 14 '13 at 12:25
@Olof yes, I just corrected the typo thanks. – Dilaton Apr 14 '13 at 12:26
up vote 7 down vote accepted

As with anything that has to do with supersymmetry the details will be dependent on your exact conventions, but we can obtain the result as follows:

Assume we have two Grassman variables $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$. By applying your first formula twice we find $$\int d\theta_1 d\theta_2 \, \theta_2 \theta_1 = 1$$ Now combine these into $$\theta = \theta_1 + i\theta_2 \qquad \text{and} \qquad \bar{\theta}=\theta_1-i\theta_2.$$ We then have $$\bar{\theta} \theta = - 2i\theta_2\theta_1$$ and hence $$\int d\theta_1 d\theta_2 \bar{\theta} \theta = - 2i$$ which is exactly your second integral, if we identify the measure $$d^2\theta = d\theta_1 d\theta_2.$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Ah thanks Olof, that is exactly what I needed. – Dilaton Apr 14 '13 at 12:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.