Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm going to start my PhD in a year and I'll be taking a gap year doing other stuff. But I also wanted to fill in the gaps in my math knowledge and I came across an arXiv publication called "Mathematics for Theoretical Physicists." This is the link.

I was wondering if anyone has read it/skimmed through it and if so, do you suggest that it's a good book?


share|cite|improve this question

closed as not constructive by David Z Apr 13 '13 at 8:09

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Related: and links therein. – Qmechanic Apr 13 '13 at 8:31
People who diagree with this recent change in policies, which disallows questions about any study material and references (papers) or education, instigated by David Zaslavsky and a few other powerful people without the whole community having a saying about it, you should have a look at this meta thread and vote accordingly. There are some people who disagree with these new policies, but they are not powerful enough. Study material/reference questions should exactly be allowed for the site to be useful for students and researchers – Dilaton Apr 14 '13 at 23:57

No, don't spend your gap year reading that unless you are really inclined to out of interest in the mathematics. If you want to be well-prepared, read Zee's QFT in a nutshell or something else that is pedagogical and helpful for the kinds of subjects that grad students are really likely to struggle with.

The problem with reading that book is that it will be too slow. You might want to read it later, but since grad school is coming, you really want to focus your attention on something that will get to the physics faster, even if it means sacrificing completeness (pun intended har har) or the material.

If you want to learn differential geometry, read Wald's GR and learn GR at the same time. If you want to learn something about Lie groups, read Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics. etc. If you want to learn more about math relevant to classical mechanics, read Dirac's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (not principles of quantum mechanics) or maybe wald's qft in curved spacetime.

share|cite|improve this answer
I've taken a graduate course in QFT already that used Peskin and Schroeder mostly and sometimes Srednicki. I am interested in QFT applications to condensed matter theory and AdS/CFT correspondence. So, I guess I was looking to improve my understanding of things I've learned as an undergrad from a mathematical point of view. Thanks for your suggestions! – user34801 Apr 13 '13 at 15:32

If you are majoring in theoretical physics, I think that it is not a good choice. The book provides a comprehensive collection of mathematical notions, but it does not mention their applications in physics.

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, that was the sense I got yesterday when I was skimming through it, but I just wanted to double-check. Thanks! – user34801 Apr 13 '13 at 15:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.