Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm interested in the “nature” of the perturbed state in perturbation theory in quantum physics.

The first order perturbed state is given by

$$ \psi^{(1)}_{n}=\Sigma_{m}a_{m}\psi^{(0)}_{m} ~, $$

where the perturbed state $\psi^{(1)}_{n}$ is expanded as a sum over unperturbed states $\psi^{(0)}_{m}$ (i.e., eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian).

Now as the Hamiltonian changes upon applying the perturbation, its basis should also change accordingly. My question is, why the basis does not change when we add a perturbation to the system? More precisely, what is the justification for expanding the perturbed state as a sum of unperturbed states?

share|cite|improve this question
    
It seems there is misuse or misunderstanding of the word “basis”. As the basis of the Hilbert space, one can use any complete set of states. The thing that changes upon adding a perturbation, is the set of the eigen-states of the Hamiltonian (not necessarily the basis of the Hilbert space). We use the same basis before and after adding the perturbation: that basis is the eigen-states of the unperturbed Hamiltonian --- as described in the answer below. – Philosophiæ Naturalis Dec 2 '15 at 18:39
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Suppose that the Hamiltonian is written as $$ H = H^{(0)} + V $$ It is assumed that both $H^{(0)}$, the unperturbed hamiltonian, and $H$, the perturbed hamiltonian, are self-adjoint. In particular, there is an orthonormal basis $\psi^{(0)}_m$ for the Hilbert space consisting of eigenvectors of $H^{(0)}$, and a an orthonormal basis $\psi_m$ consisting of eigenvectors of $H$.

One can choose to write any state $\psi$ in either basis. In particular, one can choose to write the first order perturbed state in the basis $\psi^{(0)}_m$ of $H^{(0)}$ and then use this to derive lots of useful things.

Addendum. One thing I forgot to mention is why one would want to write the perturbed state in the unperturbed basis. The simple, essential answer is that perturbation theory is so useful precisely because the unperturbed Hamiltonian can be easily diagonalized; namely it's eigenvectors and eigenvalues are known exactly, whereas those of the unperturbed Hamiltonian are not.

share|cite|improve this answer

A wavefunction is a complete description for a system where the basis states are all orthogonal. So if you think of a vector as a linear combination of the three basis vectors, any vector can be described by this method (including a different set of basis vectors). Similarly after a perturbation we can describe our new basis vectors as linear combinations of our old ones.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.