Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Quarks have the unusual characteristic of having a fractional electric charge. here there is a new model that suggests maybe an up Quark has no electric charge and infact down Quark has electric charge of (+1,-1), through weak interaction between Up Quark and W$^{\pm}$

$$u^{0}+W^{+}\to d^{+},$$ $$u^{0}+W^{-}\to d^{-},$$

sounds like this idea consisted with neutron decay. $$n^{0}\to p^{+}+W^{-},$$ $$u^{0}d^{-}d^{+}\to u^{0}u^{0}d^{+}+W^{-}.$$


share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Nathaniel, Waffle's Crazy Peanut, dmckee Apr 7 '13 at 15:25

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

That's not a reference. This guy cannot even be found on Inspire. – Vibert Apr 7 '13 at 14:03
This doesn't look like a question... – Nathaniel Apr 7 '13 at 14:09
But what's your question after all? You want to have any explanation about this? Always make your questions very explicit so that we know what is being really asked. – user1620696 Apr 7 '13 at 14:17
Possible duplicate also asking about Ahmad Reza Estakhr's quark model: – Qmechanic Apr 7 '13 at 14:31
The answer from Mitchell Porter in the -claimed- duplicate question tells most of the history: Han-Nambu solutions. – arivero Apr 7 '13 at 22:31

This idea that probabilities is associated with unknown parameters is true!, so Quarks fractional electric charge is not accurate value. it is the most probable value

share|cite|improve this answer
Completely incorrect. The quark charges can be (and have been) measured. – dmckee Apr 7 '13 at 16:19
Related post: – Qmechanic Apr 7 '13 at 18:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.