Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I learned the eigenvalue problem in linear algebra before and I just find that the quantum mechanics happen to associate the Schrodinger equation with the eigenvalue problem. In linear algebra, we always gives the matrix of certain size (e.g. 4x4) so to find the eigenvalues is identical to solve the related secular equation. In quantum mechanics, in most case, it seems that the dimension of the matrix is not known or very large so to how to find the eigenvalue in those case? I just saw a problem in a book, if we know $A|a\rangle=a|a\rangle$ and $A|b\rangle=b|b\rangle$ for a Hermitian operator $A$. What's the eigenvalue of a Hamilton operator $H=|a\rangle\langle b| + |b\rangle\langle a|$. It is so confusing to me because if we don't know the matrix and elements, how can we write the secular equation and find the eigenvalues? Sorry I didn't take any class on quantum mechanics before, I learn it all my myself so I might be wrong in some statement above.

share|improve this question
    
This is just a remark and not an answer to your questions, but I wanted to mention that in typical physical systems, the Hilbert space must be of infinite dimension. This apply more precisely when you have a pair of canonically conjugated variables, say a position operator $\hat q$ and momentum operator $\hat p$. By definition of 'canonically conjugated' they satisfy $[\hat q,\hat p] = i \text{Id}$ (up to a sign). If dimension is finite, then the trace of any operator is defined and taking the trace of this relation one arrives at a contradiction. –  Bru Apr 7 '13 at 6:59

5 Answers 5

up vote 4 down vote accepted

In principle, the operator $H$ is not a matrix. However, you can write down a matrix representation. For that, you need a basis, which should be complete (=very large matrix, probably infinitely large) - for many illustrating cases in quantum mechanics, it's not complete.

If your basis consists of $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$, it's not complete, but you can still describe some effects nicely.

You gave the example $H=|a\rangle\langle b| + |b\rangle\langle a|$, which means that $H$ is (it's just another way to write it)

$$H=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},$$

and you can calculate its eigenvalues.

For a general 2x2 Hamiltonian matrix, the formula is

$$H=\sum_{i,j}c_{i,j}|i\rangle\langle j|=\begin{pmatrix} c_{1,1} & c_{1,2}\\ c_{2,1} & c_{2,2} \end{pmatrix}$$

$i$ and $j$ can take the value $a$ and $b$.

The matrix is a 2x2 matrix because the Hamiltonian only contains two vectors, $a$ and $b$.

How to expand a Hamiltonian operator into a matrix is explained nicely on Wikipedia (first four formulas of the section). If it's already in the abstract form $H=|a\rangle\langle b| + |b\rangle\langle a|$, you can just read it off: The prefactor of $|a\rangle\langle a|$ ($=0$) is the top left entry, the prefactor of $|a\rangle\langle b|$ ($=1$) is the top left entry etc.

You don't need to know the explicit form of basis in which the matrix is written. Remember that the eigenvalues of a matrix are invariant to unitary transformations.

share|improve this answer
    
wow, it is so shocking to me that even we don't know the form or |a> and |b>, we can still write the matrix form of H? How do you do that? How can you extract the information from $H = |a\rangle \langle b| + |b \rangle \langle a|$ so to get the off-diagonal matrix element to be 1? And how do you know H is 2x2? Sorry, there is some terms I don't understand from your answer but I guess what you mean is we can choose vectors as a basis and we can also choose another matrices as basis. So in the last equation you show, you choose the matrix $|i\rangle \langle j|$ as the basis to expand H, right? –  user1285419 Apr 6 '13 at 21:29
    
"How can you extract the information from $H=|a\rangle\langle b|+|b\rangle\langle a|$ so to get the off-diagonal matrix element to be 1?": What is the prefactor of $|b\rangle\langle a|$? Or, more precisely, what is $\langle b |H| a \rangle$ if $|a\rangle,|b\rangle$ are orthogonal? –  delete000 Apr 6 '13 at 21:35
    
Thanks, I see the point now :) –  user1285419 Apr 7 '13 at 0:52

You need to understand the difference between a linear transformation T and the matrix A which represents it. The entries of A depend on the specific basis you're working in. You should recall from linear algebra that to find the columns of A, you apply T to the basis vectors.

For example, in your problem, the Hamiltonian $\hat{H}$ plays the role of T, and $\{\vert a \rangle, \lvert b \rangle\}$ is your basis. If you apply $\lvert a \rangle$ to $\hat{H}$, you get

$$ \hat{H} \lvert a \rangle = \lvert a \rangle\langle b \vert a \rangle + \lvert b \rangle\langle a \vert a \rangle = \lvert b \rangle.$$

Note that this calculation is entirely independent of the representations of the vectors and the Hamiltonian.

Now relative to our chosen basis, it should be clear to you that the vector $\lvert a \rangle$ is represented by the ordered pair $\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}$ and $\lvert b \rangle$ is represented by the ordered pair $\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}$. In terms of matrices and the ordered pairs, the relation $\hat{H}\lvert a \rangle = \lvert b \rangle$ would be written

$$A\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix},$$ so the first column of A is $\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$. You can find the second column of A by applying $\lvert b \rangle$ to $\hat{H}$. Then once you have the matrix, you can find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors the usual way.

share|improve this answer
    
I was going to post something like this but Conrad got there first. To the OP user1285419 : the eigenvalue problem can be defined for any linear operator. For example, $\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = ky$, the simple harmonic equation, is an eigenvalue problem! (look up Sturm-Liouville). The solutions to that ODE, $y$, are the eigenfunctions of the linear operator $\frac{d^2}{dx^2}$. Does $\frac{d^2}{dx^2}$ have a matrix representation? Yes - for example, choosing a basis $\{1, x, x^2, \cdots \}$, one can write an infinite dimensional matrix for it. but the important thing is that you don't have to! –  nervxxx Apr 6 '13 at 23:41

The stuff about the operator $A$ is just so that you'll know that $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$ are orthogonal (if we assume $a \neq b$). This follows from the properties of Hermitian operators (just evaluate $\langle a | A | b\rangle$ two different ways).

Since $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$ are orthogonal, they are a good choice for a basis, and we can write the matrix of $H$ in this basis. It is the operator that switches $|a\rangle$ and $|b\rangle$ (this is fairly easy to see without the matrix, but you asked for the matrix). The square of this operator is the identity, so its eigenvalues are $\pm 1$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Mark. I am not totally understand this thought I know it is right (I read the similar statement from a book). My question is even we don't know the explicit form of |a> and |b>, can we still know that the eigenvalues of H? Also, you gave that the eigenvalues are +/-1, so what's the corresponding eigenvector? I try to have H apply on |a> or |b> but it doesn't give me the |a> or |b> back so I know they are not the eigenvectors. It seems that |a>+|b> could be the eigenvectors but I don't know why (just guessing) –  user1285419 Apr 6 '13 at 21:32
    
What do you mean by "the explicit form of |a> and |b>"? They are vectors in a vector space. We know that they are orthogonal. What else do you want from them? The eigenvectors are |a> + |b> and |a> - |b>. –  Mark Eichenlaub Apr 6 '13 at 21:43

Eigenvalue problems are much more general than what you see in matrices. For example, you can look for solutions to the eigenvalue problem

$ \frac{d }{d x} y = \lambda y$

solve for $\lambda$. The solution is, of course, $y = e^{\lambda x}$ and $\lambda$ can be a continuum. If you impose some other boundary conditions, you may end up with a discrete spectrum of $\lambda$.

If you insist on a matrix representation, you can use orthogonal functions as your "basis vectors" and their orthogonality relations to define an inner product. Read up about the quantum harmonic oscillator, and Hermite polynomials are an orthogonal basis to expand the solution in that also happen to solve the differential equation exactly.

share|improve this answer

This matrix has only 2 states $ |a> $ and $ |b> $

then ti will gbe a 2x2 matrix

with elements

$ a1,1 = <a|a><b|a>+<a|b><a|a> $

$ a1,2=a2,1 = <a|a><b|b>+<a|b><a|b> $

$a2,2 = <b|a><b|b>+ <b|b><a|b> $

From this matrix you can evaluate the eigenvalues

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.