Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$u^{\mu}$ - 4-velocity

$b^{\mu}$ - 4-vector of magnetic field

$ u_{\mu}u^{\mu}=-1, \qquad u_{\mu}b^{\mu}=0 $

$$ u_{\beta}u^{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha}b^{\beta}-u_{\beta}b^{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\beta}+\nabla_{\alpha}b^{\alpha}=0 $$ I don't understand why this equation gives this $$ u^{\alpha}u^{\beta}\nabla_{\alpha}b^{\beta}+\nabla_{\alpha}b^{\alpha}=0 $$

Help me please!

share|cite|improve this question

migrated from Apr 6 '13 at 14:17

This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.

This is because $u_\alpha \nabla_\beta u^\alpha =0$. To show this, just act with $\nabla_\beta$ on both sides of the equality $u_\alpha u^\alpha = -1$. You get $$ u_\alpha \nabla_\beta u^\alpha + u^\alpha \nabla_\beta u_\alpha = 0 $$ and thus $u_\alpha \nabla_\beta u^\alpha =0$ as promised.


share|cite|improve this answer
You are correct, but perhaps use different indices (for consistency with the original question) and note the term $u_{\beta}b^{\alpha}\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\beta}$ vanishes because $u_{\beta}\nabla_{\alpha}u^{\beta}=0$? – Alex Nelson Apr 6 '13 at 17:55
Exactly. Actually the names for the indicies does not really matter as long as your are consistent with yourself. Moreover, it is obvious that if $u_\alpha \nabla_\beta u^\alpha=0$, then of course $u_\beta \nabla_\alpha u^\beta=0$. – Bru Apr 6 '13 at 18:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.