Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Q1: What is the ergodicity and ergodicity breaking in a Monte Carlo simulation of a statistical physics problem?

Q2: How does one ensure that the ergodicity is maintained ?

share|cite|improve this question
Ergodicity is a description of a system which has filled all degrees of freedom equally. For example, if you use MC method to simulate gas molecules, with constant initial velocity. The system will be ergodically distributed when the velocity follows the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. This is my understanding I'm sure there is a better definition involving entropy. Breaking this condition sounds like it implies a decrease in entropy. – boyfarrell Apr 2 '13 at 13:22

In the context of a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, ergodicity means that the algorithm that you use is designed in such a way that all points in the corresponding phase space (the one that contains the trajectory of your statistical ensemble) would be visited if the algorithm ran for an infinite amount of time. There is no way to prove that an algorithm is ergodic, as we just cannot let a simulation run infinitely. In the literature, you can find the concepts of balance and detailed balance. From a practitioner's point of view, if an algorithm fulfils detailed balance, it is safe to assume that the system behaves ergodic.

In general, you cannot show that a system is ergodic. In statistical physics, ergodicity is assumed for systems in thermal equilibrium, but this assumption cannot be proven (to my (limited) knowledge).

A good online resource for learning MC is this site with lecture notes. A good book that covers everything from the beginning is Tuckerman: Statistical Mechanics. A book that is more detailed on MC but requires solid knowledge in statistical physics is Frenkel & Smit: Understanding Molecular Simulation.

share|cite|improve this answer
I believe this answer is flawed. Detailed balance and ergodicity are two different and largely unrelated concepts. For instance, the identity transfer matrix for Markov Chain Monte Carlo satisfies detailed balance, but it is as non-ergodic as possible — the system just stays in one state and never evolves. – 4ae1e1 Mar 18 '15 at 3:52
I retract my comment "detailed balance and ergodicity are two different and largely unrelated concepts." Instead I should say detailed balance is not enough to guarantee ergodicity. The algorithm also need to be able to traverse the phase space. – 4ae1e1 Mar 18 '15 at 4:45

To complete the answers already given, ergodicity in MC simulations is a practical problem and not a conceptual one contrary to the ergodicity property in physics. Normally, if you sample your phase space with a Markov chain, it is possible to show that whatever the initial trial distribution, your Markov chain will eventually sample the Gibbs distribution associated to the statistical ensemble you are interested in.

In practice however, your system can be trapped in local minima of the potential energy surface and be ergodic only within those minima (akin to what would really happen in a supercooled liquid). This is an obvious case of ergodicity breaking in the sense suggested by sebastian above.

This can be tested quite easily as your simulations will give different averages depending on the initial condition for instance.

There are many algorithms involving multicanonical sampling or parallel tempering just to name these two that can get rid of this issue.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.