Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was reading up on the 1st law of thermodynamics for my Chemistry exam and I was wondering why doesn't fusion contradict the 1st law of thermodynamics?

The 1st law states that

The energy of an isolated system is constant

or that whatever is put into the system, you get out of it, but in fusion you get more out of the initial reactions than you put in

Hydrogen + Hydrogen = Helium etc.

I am still a bit confused... Thanks for any help!

share|cite|improve this question

migrated from Apr 1 '13 at 12:33

This question came from our site for scientific skepticism.

To answer the question simply, $E=mc^2$.

Energy is a manifestation of mass, and mass is a manifestation of energy. In a fusion or fission process, the total "energy" of the system remains constant, it just changes shape.

By "energy" I mean the totality of the already present energy, and the bound energy of the mass that takes part in the reaction.

share|cite|improve this answer
In fact, also in comubstion mass (a really small quantity) disappears. – Fabio F. Apr 1 '13 at 20:09
May I add that mass or energy are never "destroyed". It is just that matter may be destroyed, and all you have is a photon, or gamma, etc..that is a form of immense energy, and has mass=energy/c^2 – Saurabh Raje Apr 2 '13 at 12:46
@FabioF - Yes, but only if you allow energy to escape the system (light, infrared, thermal dissipation). Not suspecting you of allowing an exhaust pipe! – Jirka Hanika Apr 2 '13 at 13:53

By that logic, a battery violates the law also.

"Look, all I did was put in enough energy to flip a switch, and now an LED keeps shining and shining! I got more energy out than I put in!"

In nuclear fusion, we are releasing some latent energy which is present in the materials, by changing the nuclear structure into other materials that contain less energy.

The energy we are getting out was "put in" to those nuclear reagents.

share|cite|improve this answer

You have to realize that thermodynamics emerges from the bulk properties of matter, and this is seen better when one goes to the formalism of statistical mechanics. The first law of thermodynamics is the form conservation of energy takes in the thermodynamics mathematical framework which is constrained by classical physics.

As you must know from your chemistry courses, there exists the world of quantum mechanics, which is responsible for the existence of chemistry and its governing laws, another framework.

Special relativity has been validated experimentally many times over, and it tells us that mass itself is a type of energy .The law of conservation of energy, as @SWeko explains in his answer, includes the energy contained in the masses of the particles under consideration, the total energy being E=m*c^2.

In a similar manner where energy can be stored in chemical reactions, which can be released under appropriate conditions, energy is stored in nuclear reactions, of which fission and fusion are expressions.

In the realm of special relativity there is no meaning to the first law, because it does not describe nuclear reactions. Once the energy released by a nuclear reaction is taken into the equations then one can consider the thermodynamic properties of the sample resulting from fission or fusion.

share|cite|improve this answer

Imagine that you are converting atoms of deuterium (hydrogen with one proton and one neutron per nucleus) into the most common isotope of helium, called helium-4 (two protons, two neutrons). Deuterium isn't the most common form of hydrogen in nature, but let's just keep the math simple. Two atoms of deuterium produce one atom of helium-4.

Deuterium's molar weight can be found here to be 2.0141017778. Twice that would be 4.0282035556; but helium-4 has, as per the same source, molar weight only 4.00260325415.

Where did the remaining mass of 0.02560030145 go? Photons, radiated away. If you did not allow them to escape, you could convert them back into matter of your preference and be able to verify that the mass of such matter is still 0.02560030145, assuming no other energy has escaped your lab.

Using the famous equation mentioned in sister answers, you can even use this math to convert familiar units of mass (such as grams) to units of energy (such as megawatt hours), if you prefer to keep the energy as energy, sell some of it on the power market and waste the rest during the conversion to electricity.

share|cite|improve this answer

protected by Jim Jul 15 '15 at 20:40

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?