Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If you try to integrate the solution of the potential step,

you will notice that it diverges! Doesn't that mean that the solution is physically incorrect?

share|cite|improve this question
In quantum physics there are often "large-size" (also called infrared) divergences. They're not very problematic, since generic real life systems are typically finite slabs of matter, so no solution can extend to infinity. – Vibert Apr 1 '13 at 10:26

This pathology is not peculiar to the potential step problem, or 1D problems even. It is a general feature of expanding solutions of Schrodinger equation in plane waves (or their equivalent for some other potential). These solutions are not normalisable, so technically they are not member of the Hilbert space of states. You are right. These states are not physical. But they can be linearly combined into wavepacket states which are normalisable.

There is a mathematical formalism making all of this rigorous, but for most physical purposes it is unnecessary since at the end of the day all you care about are wavepackets. Look up "rigged Hilbert space" for more information.

share|cite|improve this answer
Good answer. However, there is something that confused me about this. In Zettili's Quantum Mechanics, the author mentioned mentioned while trying to find the constants A, B, C (the constants of the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves, respectively): "As for the constant A, it can be determined from the normalization condition of the wave function, but we don't need it here...." So it seems that the author is mistaken about this? – Promather Apr 1 '13 at 10:24
They are possibly using a delta function normalisation (this is the practical version of the rigged Hilbert space construction). You text should discuss their conventions somewhere under plane wave or momentum eigenstates. – Michael Brown Apr 1 '13 at 11:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.