Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Adding milk first increases the volume to heat and lowers average temerature, but adding it afterwards seems to have similar effects. How can you compare the two?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

By adding milk first you reduce heat loss during heating due to lower average temperature. The rate of heat transfer to the surroundings depends on the difference in temperature between the object and its surroundings, so lower average temperature-> less energy lost to the surroundings.

So if you add milk first, you will get higher temperature at the end.

But personally, I prefer to add milk after, as it's more sensetive to overheating. You can heat cofee to 100C without any damage to it.

share|cite|improve this answer
Everything you said is correct but you didn't actually answer the question. – user12345 Sep 11 '12 at 14:45

;-) recipe:
0: get a watch, a thermometer, two equal doses of milk and two of coffee and a microwave. As you have a computer to make the annotations, a pen and a stencil are not needed.
1 : write down a proper definition of 'efficiency', choose one at your will.
2 : do the proposed first experiment, time the results and the temps. Taste ;-)
3 : do the proposed second experiment reversing the order, time the results and the temps. Taste ;-)
4 : compare the resultant temps and tastes (is a bit subjective but it is important) with the settled goal (efficiency deffinition).
5 : kindly let us know your conclusion.

You may think that I am making fun, but it is not so. The experimental way, when available, is the best solution. You have a courious mind, dont stop. A personnal learning process is good.
To be more rigourous one can invent a physical model (between point 1 and 2) to advance a candidate outcome. But the point 1 is allways indispensable.

end of recipe ;-)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.