Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So there's a rope wrapped around a circular drum, subtending an angle $\theta$. A large force, $T_A$, pulls in in one direction, and a much smaller force $T_B$ pulls in in another direction.

image of setup

The rope remains motionless. The coefficient of friction between the drum and the rope is $\mu$. I'm supposed to show that $T_B=T_Ae^{-\mu\theta}$. I've tried to work this from both directions.

Backwards, it seems like I would need to first get $\log{\frac{T_B}{T_A}}=-\mu\theta$, and in order to get that I'd need an integral from $T_B$ to $T_A$ of what I imagine would be one over the frictional force, but I have no idea where that integral would come from.

Forward, I've tried to find the radial force on the pulley, so that I can derive the frictional force. The book I'm using contains a derivation of the force on a pulley by a rope under constant tension, where they use an infinitesimal angle element, find $$\Delta F=2T\sin{\frac{\Delta \theta}{2}}=T\Delta \theta$$ and then show that the horizontal component is $T\cos{\theta}\Delta \theta$ and integrate to get a total horizontal force of $2T\sin{\theta_0}$ (where $\theta_0$ is the angle subtended by the rope). Now in my problem the tension from both sides of the rope is not constant, so I replaced $T$ with $T_A+T_B$. I'm also looking for the radial force, not the horizontal force, which I think I could get by leaving out the $\cos{\theta}$ in the integral, since the infinitesimal force element is radial. But then I get $$\int_{0}^{\theta} \frac{T_A+T_B}{2}\ \mathrm{d}{\theta'}=\frac{T_A+T_B}{2}\theta$$ which would give frictional force $\frac{T_A+T_B}{2}\theta\mu$, which doesn't have anything close to a logarithm or an exponential. So essentially I'm asking, what is wrong with my method of integrating around the drum, because I'm pretty sure there should be a logarithm in it. Thanks for the help!

share|cite|improve this question
Hi Liam, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! I edited in the image for you. – David Z Mar 26 '13 at 17:26
@DavidZaslavsky Thanks! – Liam Mar 26 '13 at 17:28
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Draw a free body diagram for a small rope element subtending an angle $\Delta\theta$. Using the result for the force on the pulley derived in your book, you will find that the force of friction on that small element is $$ f = \mu \Delta F = \mu T\Delta\theta $$ and the total tangential force on the element is $$ -T(\theta+\Delta\theta) - \mu T\Delta\theta + T(\theta) $$ Since the pulley is not moving, this should be set to zero by Newton's second law, and a little rearrangement gives $$ \Delta T = -\mu T\Delta \theta $$ which in the limit of $\Delta\theta\to 0$ gives $$ \frac{dT}{d\theta} = -\mu T $$ which upon integration gives the desired result!

P.S. I love Kleppner/Kolenkow don't you? I remember discussing this problem with my TA 8 years ago :)

share|cite|improve this answer
I do! I've tried other Newtonian mechanics books but Kleppner/Kolenkow is really the best. – Liam Mar 26 '13 at 17:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.