Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I studied that mercury motion around the sun slightly displace by a certain value in each year. But, this is not predicted by kepler until general theory of relativity. What does general theory does with mercury.

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Nathaniel, Jerry Schirmer, Waffle's Crazy Peanut, David Z Mar 26 '13 at 16:19

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

According to Newton's laws of gravity, Kepler's laws are exact for the 2-body problem and the elliptic curves are exactly periodic. The perihelion – point on the orbit where the Mercury is closest to the Sun – is exactly at the same place.

enter image description here

But this is a very special feature of the $A/r$ potential. If you consider the potential to be $A/r+B/r^2$, you would find out that the perihelion doesn't stay at the same place. General relativity basically allows you to replace the gravitational field of the Sun by the $A/r+B/r^2$ in a certain approximation; the extra term arises because the gravitational field is "nonlinear" and acts on itself i.e. Einstein's equations of general relativity don't quite obey the superposition principle. The second term $B/r^2$ is particularly important if $r$ is small enough, it's very strong for the planets that are closest to the Sun. Mercury is ideal to see it.

When you calculate how much the perihelion of Mercury changes its location in a century, you will get something like 40 arc seconds per century, and it exactly agreed with some discrepancies between theory and experiments. Well, the total measured precession is 574 arc seconds per century, but most of it was explained by the action of other planets etc. already before Einstein. Remarkably enough, they were able to determine that 40 arc seconds per century were still wrong.

See also

share|cite|improve this answer
+1: I'm happy that someone actually explained this. I don't like answers totally made from references. But referenced answers are good. Now, I have a thought that this question can be kept unclosed, while the other one can be closed (a stackexchange impossibility) :D – Waffle's Crazy Peanut Mar 26 '13 at 13:21

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.