Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently saw this article in my Google News page, whose headline and first paragraph are:

Antimatter's Magnetic Charge Revealed

Scientists say they've made the most precise measurements to date of the magnetic charge of single particles of matter and its spooky counterpart antimatter.

From my intro-level E&M class, and the relevant Wikipedia article, I was under the impression that, by definition, a magnetic monopole would be an object with a net "magnetic charge".

If these researchers had found magnetic monopoles, I imagine there'd be a lot more coverage, so it seems like it's much more likely to be a case of shoddy science reporting. If so, what is the actual concept they are attempting to refer to?

share|improve this question
3  
The article is horrible and makes no sense to me, and they don't even link to the PRL paper. I wonder if they're talking about the magnetic dipole moment. –  Siva Mar 26 '13 at 4:58
1  
Dont take such news stories too serious, popular science journalism is way too slopy up to misleading or even wrong these days... –  Dilaton Mar 26 '13 at 6:40
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The article is pretty poorly written. As Siva said it doesn't even link to the original paper. So I just looked up the name mentioned in the article and found this which is probably what they're talking about (though this is just a guess). They measured the magnetic dipole moment of protons and antiprotons to ~4 parts per million (and verified the CPT theorem at this level).


And yes, magnetic monopoles still haven't been observed.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.