Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've seen the phrase "as measured in a local Lorentz frame" tagged on the end of so many sentences.

What does it mean precisely?

To give an explanation with an example, consider the context of measuring the speed of an object, if this applies.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

You consider processes where you have no geodesic deviation over the whole area, in the appropriate time frame.

Notice that in every point $p$ of your pseudo-Riemannian manifold, you can find a coordinate system such that $g(x)=\eta+\mathcal{O}(x^2)$. Mathematically, in any neightborhood $U_p$ around $p$, you can't turn off the graitational effects completely, but if you speak of a "local inertial frame", or "Lorentz frame", then they are supposed to be negligible for the other physics you're interested in.

share|cite|improve this answer

I think it's safe to say that this phrase means the same thing as "local inertial frame." Assuming that this is actually is a safe assumption, I'll describe, physically, what a local inertial frame is. I can give a lot of mathematical detail in an addendum if you wish.

In special relativity, we assume that spacetime is flat, and in this case, any observer moving with a constant three-velocity below $c$ is called an inertial observer. The laws of physics look the same to all such observers.

In general relativity, the spacetime is not necessarily flat, but in small regions of spacetime, the spacetime looks approximately flat, and freely falling massive observers, which move along timelike geodesics, when making measurements in small regions of spacetime around them, will see physics that is approximately the same as that seen by an inertial observer in flat spacetime as in special relativity.

One then says that such observers are making observations from reference frames that are locally inertial.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm pretty sure Misner Thorne and Wheeler explicitly says almost your first sentence (local Lorentz = local inertial) somewhere, although I can't for the life of me put my hand on it now. My pdf is from my own, destroyed-by-its-own-weight paperback and so not searchable. – WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance Aug 19 '15 at 12:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.