Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to calculate the maximum acceleration a car can achieve with the current gear ratio. I am ignoring drag forces and friction to keep it simple.

I'm doing this by:

  • calculating the torque on the wheels: $T_e/G$ (engine torque / Gear ratio)
  • Calculate the Force exerted on the ground: T_w/r (wheel torque / wheel radius)
  • then finding the acceleration using $F=ma$

However acceleration values are too small. Is there something wrong with my reasoning?

My car's engine Torque is 500Nm, gear ratios: [2.97,2.08,1,0.86,0.56], car's mass = 2500Kg

share|cite|improve this question

The gear ratios are gearing down, i.e. they reduce the angular velocity at the wheels and increase the torque. The correct formula is:

$$ T_{wheels} = T_{engine} G $$

Plus don't forget that there is a differential gear as well as the gearbox, and this reduces the angular velocity and increases the torque as well. The value of $G$ in your equation is the gearbox ratio multiplied by the differential ratio.

Response to comment:

I don't know what the differential gearing is in your car, but differentials are generally around 4:1 so let's take this value. In that case the torque at the wheels in first gear is:

$$T_{wheels} = 500 \times 2.97 \times 4 = 5940Nm $$

I would guess the tyre radius is about 0.3m, so the force at the contact between the tyre and ground is:

$$ F = \frac{T_{wheels}}{r} = \frac{5940}{0.3} = 19800N $$

So the acceleration is:

$$ a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{19800}{2500} = 7.92ms^{-2} $$

That seems pretty good to me. 0.8g!

share|cite|improve this answer
hmm ... thanks, it makes more sense. Yet this makes my acceleration values even smaller. I'm expecting values of around 1.5m/s^2 yet this gives me acceleration values like 0.0028m/s^2 which is way to low. :/ – Jonny Mar 23 '13 at 18:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.