Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is related to a question about a simple model of a polymer chain that I have asked yesterday. I have a Hamiltonian that is given as:

$H = \sum\limits_{i=1}^N \frac{p_{\alpha_i}^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{N-1} m \omega^2(\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1})^2 $

where $\alpha_i$ are generalized coordinates and the $p_{\alpha_i}$ are the corresponding conjugate momenta. I want to find the equations of motion. From Hamilton's equations I get

$\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_{\alpha_i}} = \dot{\alpha_i} = \frac{p_{\alpha_i}}{m} \tag{1}$

$- \frac{\partial H}{\partial {\alpha_i}} = \dot{p_{\alpha_i}} = -m \omega^2 (\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1} ) \tag{2}$

, for $i = 2,...,N-1$. Comparing this to my book, (1) is correct, but (2) is wrong. (2) should really be

$- \frac{\partial H}{\partial {\alpha_i}} = \dot{p_{\alpha_i}} = -m \omega^2 (2\alpha_i - \alpha_{i+1} - \alpha_{i-1}) \tag{$2_{correct}$}$

Clearly, I am doing something wrong. I suspect that I'm not chain-ruling correctly. But I also don't get, where the $\alpha_{i-1}$ is coming from. Can anybody clarify?

share|improve this question
    
btw, how do I number equations in the latex environment of stackexchange? this looks kinda ugly. –  lomppi Mar 23 '13 at 10:16
    
You can use \tag{your_label} following the equation. –  joshphysics Mar 23 '13 at 10:25

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Instead of using the chain rule (although it of course gives the same answer) expand the square of the $i^\mathrm{th}$ term in the sum parentheses to obtain $$ \alpha_i^2 - 2\alpha_i\alpha_{i+1}+\alpha_{i+1}^2 $$ differentiating this with respect to $\alpha_i$ gives $$ 2\alpha_1 - 2\alpha_{i+1} $$ Now, from the $(i-1)^\mathrm{th}$ term $$ \alpha_{i-1}^2 - 2\alpha_{i-1}\alpha_i + \alpha_i^2 $$ you get an additional $$ -2\alpha_{i-1} + 2\alpha_i $$ when you take the $\alpha_i$ derivative. Putting these results together gives the answer in the book.

share|improve this answer
    
ok, so when I would write this entire sum out and then I differentiate w.r.t. $\alpha_i$, of course I have this contribution from the $(i-1)^{th}$ term! brilliant. thanks for claryfing. I totally missed that. –  lomppi Mar 23 '13 at 10:26
    
Sure thing sugar bean. –  joshphysics Mar 23 '13 at 10:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.