# Are Neutron stars transparent?

Neutrons have no charge so they would not, I think, interact with photons. Would a neutron star be transparent?

-
Related, perhaps an effective duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/22722/… . Opinions? –  dmckee Mar 22 '13 at 0:04
@dmckee Pretty close duplicate. –  Michael Brown Mar 22 '13 at 0:26
–  Nikos M. Aug 11 at 16:46

Neutron stars are one of the least transparent objects in the universe. There are still lots of protons and free electrons, and most importantly the density of these charged species is extremely high. Also, the quarks, which constitute neutrons, are charged---so due to their density, I would guess (hopefully an expert will chime in) that that is also plenty to keep them optically thick. Definitely once you get to gamma-ray energies, neutrons will interact with photons.

-

Neutron stars are not charged, but they definitely have magnetic dipole moments, and these DO interact with the electromagnetic field.

-
Hi Jerry, I was wondering about this while formulating my response. Would you need to worry about the magnetic field before it's energy density became comparable to that of the radiation field? Or is that the relevant regime? –  zhermes Mar 22 '13 at 4:03
In principle the gamma could, indeed, couple pretty well to the neutron EDM, but in practice the vast majority of those neutrons have no accessible states to scatter into---you have to get them above the Fermi surface, right? I think that Ron and John's analyses in the proposed duplicate are the way to go. –  dmckee Mar 22 '13 at 14:03
@dmckee: I'm sure you could work out what the scattering depth of a solid substance with a constant magnetic polarization. And I'm pretty sure that it would be pretty shallow for something like a neutron star, which is basically a ferromagnet. –  Jerry Schirmer Mar 23 '13 at 0:34

You can think about it in more practical terms. It is known that one metre thick lead can stop very energetic $\gamma$-photons. Then, given that a neutron star is billions of times denser than lead and several kilometres across, it is not very likely that a neutron star will be transparent.

-
Note that lead is a good photon absorber because it has a high electron number density, so while the facts here are correct the reasoning is suspect. –  dmckee Mar 22 '13 at 13:53
@dmckee If you take into account the fact that there are some $10^{44}$ neutrons per m$^3$(only a rough estimate,) about 16 orders of magnitude higher than the number of electrons in lead in the same volume, and that each neutron has three charged particles (quarks,) then perhaps the answer maybe not such suspect. If the question is talking about transparency to neutrinos, then the answer could be different, as it could be possible for neutrinos to travel through the neutron star. –  JKL Mar 22 '13 at 23:29
A visible photon can not interact with the bulk of those neutrons because they are far, far below the Fermi surface. The bulk material is presumably opaque anyway simply because the conversion of proton to neutrons only proceeds until the electron Fermi surface is in agreement with that of the neutrons, so there are free protons in the mix. –  dmckee Mar 22 '13 at 23:39

Light with wavelength $\lambda\gg10\,\mathrm{km}$ can pass around a neutron star thanks to diffraction, even if the star is made of a perfectly absorbing material. That's exceptionally low-energy radio waves, though, and pretty different from what you probably had in mind.

-