Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is problem $1.2$ of Molecular Quantum Mechanics by Atkins, 4th edition. I'm given the momentum operator




and I need to find $x$ in this particular representation. A suitable solution, inspired by the formalism of the quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator is:

$$x=-i\sqrt{\frac{m\hbar}{2}}(A-B) $$

Checking it:

$$ [x,p]=-i\sqrt{\frac{m\hbar}{2}}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m}}\left( [A+B,A-B]\right)=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}\left( [A,A]-[A,B]+[B,A]-[B,B]\right)=\frac{i\hbar}{2}2[A,B]=i\hbar$$

How to derive (perhaps algebraically) another particular solution for $x$ without having the harmonic oscillator hint?

share|cite|improve this question
Have you tried some arbitrary linear combination $x=aA+bB$? Requiring $[x,p]=i\hbar$ then requires $a-b=i\sqrt{2m\hbar}$. If you then want a specific solution to come out uniquely you'd need a second condition. (For the harmonic oscillator, you also ask that $x$ be hermitian for $B=A^\dagger$.) – Emilio Pisanty Mar 18 '13 at 22:48
Hi Emilio thanks for the comment. I was thinking (and maybe is asking too much) in not forcing $x$ to be an specific combination of $A$ and $B$, say, a linear one. The specific solution in my question is because we can always add an arbitrary function of $p$ to $x$ and the CCR $[x,p]=i\hbar$ will still hold. So inserting $x$ and $p$ into the CCR and then derive some general form for $x$ given $[A,B]=1$. Also, thanks for the hermitian requeriment reminder – Jorge Mar 18 '13 at 22:52
@Nivalth Do you know the commutation rule between x and the A and B? – JKL Mar 19 '13 at 23:08
@JKL No, it is not give but it should be something like $[x,A+B]=Ci\hbar$ for some $C$ – Jorge Mar 20 '13 at 14:52
@Nivalth, in the above comment, C is easily determined by knowing the canonical [x,P]. – sujeet Mar 24 '13 at 21:38
up vote 2 down vote accepted

As was said in the comments, my attempt to a solution is to decompose $\hat{x}$ as a linear combination $\alpha \hat{A} + \beta \hat{B}$. This seems to be general, because if $\hat{p}$ is a linear combination of $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$, then the position will be too, since it's the inverse Fourier transform of $\hat{p}$ and such transformation is linear. I'd them use $[\alpha \hat{A} + \beta \hat{B},\hat{p}] = i \hbar$ and find that (as Emilio said) $\alpha - \beta = i\sqrt{2\pi m}$. It is, with the current information we have, impossible to determine individually $\alpha$ and $\beta$, but to provide the answer you're looking for we can choose $\alpha = -i\sqrt{\frac{\pi m}{2}} = -\beta$.

Sorry I didn't write a comment. I've just start using SE and have not enough rep points. Consider this attempt as a comment and erase it, if you find better.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.