Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I just starting to study GR and I could not prove the following: if I have to tensors $T_{\mu\nu}$ and $Q_{\mu\nu}$ such that $T_{\mu\nu}=Q_{\mu\nu}$, why can I multiply both sides of the equation by $g^{\mu\nu}$, i.e., why is valid $g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}Q_{\mu\nu}$? Why some authors call it "tracing the equation with $g^{\mu\nu}$"?

share|improve this question
1  
Repeated indices are summed over. What is your problem with the formalism specifically? –  user18764 Mar 10 '13 at 18:55
    
If $x=5$, why is it valid that I can do $2x = 10$? –  Muphrid Mar 10 '13 at 19:10
    
If I multiply both sides of $T_{\mu\nu}=Q_{\mu\nu}$ by a scalar, than it is ok! But I cant see why I can multiply by $g^{\mu\nu}$ since there is sum implicit! –  robert Mar 10 '13 at 19:15
1  
Write the sum out in components (don't need all 4 dimensions, just try two). It should become obvious then. –  twistor59 Mar 10 '13 at 19:20
    
thank you very much! –  robert Mar 10 '13 at 20:09

1 Answer 1

Note that $g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}$ is just another way of writing $$ \sum_{\mu,\nu = 0}^3 g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu} $$ Now, if we know that $T_{\mu\nu} = Q_{\mu\nu}$ for every $\mu,\nu = 0,\dots 3$, then we can simply substitute $Q_{\mu\nu}$ in for $T_{\mu\nu}$ in the sum. In other words $$ \sum_{\mu,\nu = 0}^3 g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu} = \sum_{\mu,\nu = 0}^3 g^{\mu\nu}Q_{\mu\nu} $$ but the sum on the right can be written using the summation convention as $g^{\mu\nu}Q_{\mu\nu}$. So, putting this all together, we have shown that $$ g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu} = g^{\mu\nu}Q_{\mu\nu} $$ Authors call it "tracing" because they are making an analogy with taking the trace of a matrix. Note, in particular, that if $g^{\mu\nu} = \delta^{\mu\nu}$ then we would have $$ g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu} = \delta^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu} = T_{\mu\mu} = \sum_{\mu=0}^3T_{\mu\mu} =\mathrm{tr}(T) $$ where $T$ is the matrix with components $T_{\mu\nu}$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you very much! –  robert Mar 10 '13 at 20:08
    
Hello, it should be $T_{\mu\mu}$ in the last equation after summing over $\nu$ with the delta function. –  gns-ank Mar 10 '13 at 20:16
    
@robert sure thang brotha. –  joshphysics Mar 10 '13 at 21:08
    
@gns-ank thanks; changed the index. –  joshphysics Mar 10 '13 at 21:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.