Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Please see the next link:

In (2.13), he used: $$\nabla({\bf u}^2)=2({\bf u}\cdot \nabla){\bf u} - 2(\nabla \times {\bf u}) \times {\bf u}.$$

Is this is a formula? can someone let me some details/link about this formula?

Any help appreciated!

share|cite|improve this question
See e.g. Wikipedia. – Qmechanic Mar 9 '13 at 13:46
Look at pg 68 of Panasatasiou et al.This is a fluid mechanics book available for free. – drN Mar 9 '13 at 14:17
up vote 4 down vote accepted

This is more like a maths question to me. This is just an identity, which is true and facilitates the calculation and it is valid for any vector field.

The proof, using Einstein summation convention would be something like:

$$ (\nabla \times \vec u )\times \vec u = \epsilon_{ijk}(\nabla \times u)_j u_k = \\ \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{jlm}\partial_l (u_m) u_k = \epsilon_{jki}\epsilon_{jlm}\partial_l (u_m) u_k = \\ (\delta_{kl}\delta_{im} - \delta_{km}\delta_{il}) \partial_l (u_m) u_k = \\ \partial_k (u_i) u_k - \partial_i (u_k) u_k = (\vec u \cdot \vec \nabla) \vec u - \frac 1 2 \nabla(\vec u \cdot \vec u) $$

I hope that helps.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.