Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have seen this derivation:

enter image description here

  • I want to estimate what is the intensity of the electrical field as function of $r$ the distance from the radiated source ?

  • I think it is can modled as pointed source which implies a spherical wave whose intensity goes like $1/r^2$. But I think I remember from school it should be fall like $1/r^3$.

share|cite|improve this question
second link in google for "dipole radiation". Hope this helps. – Robert Filter Mar 8 '13 at 22:02
@RobertFilter didn't see the connection i was looking for in your link – 0x90 Mar 9 '13 at 6:28
please look for the farfield of the dipole radiation which is what you are asking for. – Robert Filter Mar 9 '13 at 18:47

Actually, if you ask about radial dependace of time-avaraged Poynting flux vector, then it depends on where the observer is (far field or near field). If you assume that the observer is far away (more than $\frac{2D^2}{\lambda}$, where $D$ - is the maximum size of your source and $\lambda$ - is the walength (I see you use monocromatic case)) than the intensity should degrade as $\frac{1}{r^2}$ (in case there is no absorbtion in medium, if yes, then it should be a little faster, for example $\frac{1}{r^{2+\alpha}}, \alpha>0$). In the near field region electric and magnetic field components have several terms: $\frac{1}{r},\frac{1}{r^2},\frac{1}{r^3}$, so the Poynting vector should have several components too and they all degrade as $\frac{1}{r^5}$ (and that's even without absorbtion).

share|cite|improve this answer

Don't confuse amplitude with intensity. The amplitude of the near field of a dipole falls off as $1/r^3$. The far field however consists of photons. Since the energy content of a photon usually doesn't change by itself (ignoring relativity) the intensity of the far field can only fall of fas $1/r^2$ which means the amplitude falls off as $1/r$. That is because a sphere with x times the radius but the same number of photons distributed over it's surface will have $1/x^2$ of the photon density.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.