Since frequency of a wave is a function of time, then for a particular ray of the wave, why would the frequency remain the same when observed from a moving reference frame? The frequency should change according to time dilation. No?
Tell me more
×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
Yes, the frequency does change. This is a component of the relativistic Doppler effect. The effect comes from two sources: first, there is the classical (nonrelativistic) Doppler effect, which comes from the fact that successive crests of the wave are emitted from closer and closer to the receiver (I use the case where the emitter is moving toward the receiver). This changes the frequency as $$f_\text{received} = \biggl(1 + \frac{v}{c}\biggr)f_\text{emitted}$$ That part has nothing to do with relativity; it's responsible for the Doppler effect we hear in sound waves, for example. Then on top of that, for light, the frequency is subject to the Lorentz transformation. Since frequency is the reciprocal of a time, it has the inverse of the transformation for time, namely $f\to \gamma f$. So the combined result from the two effects is $$f_\text{received} = \gamma\biggl(1 + \frac{v}{c}\biggr)f_\text{emitted} = \sqrt{\frac{c + v}{c - v}}f_\text{emitted}$$ for relative approach. |
|||||||||||
|
|
Both the the frequency and wavelength change. Obviously so because $\nu\lambda = c$ and $c$ is a constant. If you have a specific example of where you think the frequency doesn't change update your question with the details and I'll update my answer to address it. |
|||
|
|
