Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In classical electrodynamics, what is the radiated power from a generalized source (consisting of charge density $\rho$ and current density $\vec{J}$) in vacuum?

Let us define $V_s$ to be the smallest sphere that completely encloses all source points -- that is, it is the smallest sphere outside which $\rho\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = 0$ for all $t$. Let us say $\mathcal{R}_s$ is the radius of $V_s$.

Now let us define another sphere $V$ concentric with $V_s$. Let us say the radius of this sphere is $\mathcal{R}$, and $\mathcal{R} > \mathcal{R}_s$.

So what is power crossing the surface of $V$ at any instant? In other words, what is the value of the following? $$ P\left(\mathcal{R},t\right) = \oint_{\partial V} \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \space d\vec{s}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac{1}{\mu_0} \oint_{\partial V} \left( \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \right) \cdot \space d\vec{s}\left(\vec{r}\right) $$

Below, I have provided an answer for the 'far field' approximation ($\mathcal{R} \gg \mathcal{R}_s$). Are there 'sanitized' expressions for cases where this approximation does not hold?

Even if there isn't a 'clean' expression for the general case, what I am looking for is the following. Let us say that there are two instants $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that for all $\vec{r} \in V_s$ we have $\rho\left(\vec{r}, t_1\right) = \rho\left(\vec{r}, t_2\right)$ and $\vec{J}\left(\vec{r}, t_1\right) = \vec{J}\left(\vec{r}, t_2\right)$. If we now define: $$ \mathcal{P}_{\infty}\left(t\right) = \lim_{\mathcal{R}\to\infty} P\left(\mathcal{R},t + \frac {\mathcal{R}} {c}\right) \\ \mathcal{P}_{\delta}\left(\mathcal{R},t\right) = P\left(\mathcal{R},t + \frac {\mathcal{R}} {c}\right) - \mathcal{P}_{\infty}\left(t\right) $$ ... can the following be proven? $$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \mathcal{P}_{\delta}\left(\mathcal{R},t\right)\space dt = 0 $$ Also, is it true (and can it be proven) that if $\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ is the unit normal at any $\vec{r} \in V$, there will always be one axis along which $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = 0$?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

There are some problems with this derivation, it kind of works only when $R\to\infty$ and when $\dfrac {\partial\vec{J}} {\partial t}$ is very small.

For $\mathcal{R} \gg \mathcal{R}_s$, if we define: $$ \vec{Y}\left(t\right)= \iiint_{V_s} \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \space dV\left(\vec{r}\right) ,\qquad \vec{Z}\left(t\right)= \iiint_{V_s} \frac{\partial \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t\right)} {\partial t} \space dV\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac {d \vec{Y}\left(t\right)} {dt} $$ and also $$ t_{\mathcal{R}} = t - \frac{\mathcal{R}} {c} $$ Assuming that the origin is at the center of $V$, so that $\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \hat{r}$, the results are: $$ \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac { \left( \vec{Y}\left(t_\mathcal{R}\right) \times \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) \right) \cdot \left(\vec{Z}\left(t_\mathcal{R}\right) \times \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) \right) } {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0\mathcal{R}^3 c^2} + \frac { \left| \vec{Z}\left(t_\mathcal{R}\right) \times \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) \right|^2 } {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0\mathcal{R}^2 c^3} \\ P\left(\mathcal{R},t\right) = \frac {1} {6 \pi \epsilon_0 c^2} \left( \frac {\vec{Y}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\cdot\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)} {\mathcal{R}} + \frac {\left|\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\right|^2} {c} \right) \\ \mathcal{P}_{\infty}\left(t\right) = \frac {\left|\vec{Z}\left(t\right)\right|^2} {6 \pi \epsilon_0 c^3} ,\qquad \mathcal{P}_{\delta}\left(\mathcal{R},t\right) = \frac {\vec{Y}\left(t\right)\cdot\vec{Z}\left(t\right)} {6 \pi \epsilon_0 \mathcal{R} c^2} $$

Derivation

Given the following definitions: $$ \vec{R} = \vec{r} - \vec{r}_s, \qquad R = \left | \vec{R} \right |, \qquad t_r = t - \frac {R} {c} $$ From Jefimenko's Equations, the value of $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{B}$ for any $\vec{r}$ and any $t$ is as follows: $$ \vec{E}(\vec{r},t) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \iiint_{V_s} {\left( \frac {\rho (\vec{r}_s, t_r)} {R^3} \vec{R} + \frac {1} {R^2 c} \frac {\partial \rho (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \vec{R} - \frac {1} {R c^2} \frac {\partial \vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \right)} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $$ \vec{B}(\vec{r},t) = \frac {\mu_0} {4 \pi} \iiint_{V_s} {\left( \frac {\vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r)} {R^3} \times \vec{R} + \frac {1} {R^2 c} \frac {\partial \vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \times \vec{R} \right)} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ Using this, we can write down the expression for $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)$, which has six terms, each of which is a product of two volume integrals. We are, however, interested in $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$, where, if we designate the center of $V$ (and $V_s$) as $\vec{r}_0$: $$ \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac {\vec{r}-\vec{r}_0} {\left|\vec{r}-\vec{r}_0\right|} $$ Now if we choose a frame of reference where $\vec{r}_0$ is the origin, we find that $\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \hat{r}$. When $\mathcal{R} \gg \mathcal{R}_s$, we can consider $\dfrac{\left|\vec{r}_s\right|}{\left|\vec{r}_s\right|} \approx 0$. Thus, irrespective of $\vec{r}_s$ under this 'far field' approximation, $\vec{R}\approx\vec{r}-\vec{r}_s$, and is effectively independent of $\vec{r}_s$, so it can be taken outside of the volume integrals.

Then, because $\left(\vec{a}\times\left(\vec{b}\times\vec{a}\right)\right)\cdot\vec{a}=0$ four of the six terms in $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ turn out to be zero.

Next, we substitute $\vec{Y}$ and $\vec{Z}$ into the expression for $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ and get the expression listed above.

To help us with the surface integral, we define a spherical coordinate system $(\mathscr{r},\theta,\phi),\space 0\le \mathscr{r}\lt\infty,\space 0\le\theta\le\pi,\space 0\le\phi\le 2\pi$ with its center at $\vec{r}_0$, and orient it such that: $\vec{Z}\left(t\right)$ is $( |\vec{Z}\left(t\right)|, 0, 0)$ and $\vec{Y}\left(t\right)$ is $( |\vec{Y}\left(t\right)|, \gamma\left(t), 0\right)$. Note that the orientation of this coordinate system changes with time. In this coordinate system, therefore, $\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ at any instant $t$ has to be represented in terms of the retarded time as $\left(1,\vartheta\left(\vec{r},t_r\right), \varphi\left(\vec{r},t_r\right)\right)$

Working out $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ in this coordinate system, we get: $$ \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac {\left|\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 {\mathcal{R}}^2 c^3} \sin^2\vartheta\left(\vec{r},t_{\mathcal{R}}\right) + \frac {\vec{Y}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\cdot\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 {\mathcal{R}}^3 c^2} \sin^2\vartheta\left(\vec{r},t_{\mathcal{R}}\right) \\ - \frac {\left|\vec{Y}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\times\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)\right|} {32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 {\mathcal{R}}^3 c^2} \sin2\vartheta\left(\vec{r},t_{\mathcal{R}}\right) \cos\varphi\left(\vec{r},t_{\mathcal{R}}\right) $$

Finally, we compute the surface integral. For a sphere $V$ of radius $\mathcal{R}$ we get: $$ \oint_{\partial V} \sin^2\vartheta\left(\vec{r}\right) \space ds(\vec{r}) = \frac {8 \pi \mathcal{R}^2} {3},\qquad \oint_{\partial V} \sin 2\vartheta\left(\vec{r}\right) \space\cos\varphi\left(\vec{r}\right) \space ds(\vec{r})= 0 $$

Substituting, we get our result.

Observations

For the record,because of the way we've defined $V_s$ and because of conservation of charge, $Q_s$ is the (constant) total charge inside $V_s$, $$ \iiint_{V_s} \rho\left(\vec{r},t\right) \space dV\left(\vec{r}\right) = Q_s ,\qquad \iiint_{V_s} \frac{\partial \rho\left(\vec{r},t\right)} {\partial t} \space dV\left(\vec{r}\right) = \frac {d Q_s} {dt} = 0 $$ ... but we don't need these terms in the derivation.

Also, $\int_{t_1}^{t_2} \mathcal{P}_{\delta}\left(\mathcal{R},t\right) \space dt = 0$ because: $$ \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \vec{Y}(t)\cdot\vec{Z}(t) dt = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \vec{Y}(t)\cdot\frac{d\vec{Y}}{dt}(t) dt = \frac12 \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac{d}{dt}|\vec{Y}(t)|^2 dt = \frac{1}{2} \left[|\vec{Y}(t)|^2\right]_{t_1}^{t_2} $$ and $$\forall\vec{r}\in V: \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t_1\right) = \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t_2\right) \implies \vec{Y}\left(t_1\right) = \vec{Y}\left(t_2\right)$$

The value of $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right)\cdot\hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right)$ is zero whenever $\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right) \times \hat{n}\left(\vec{r}\right) = 0$, that is, wherever the unit normal is parallel to $\vec{Z}\left(t_{\mathcal{R}}\right)$

share|improve this answer
add comment
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I realized that $\vec{W}$, $\vec{Y}$ and $\vec{Z}$ depend on both $\vec{r}$ and $t$ independently, anot not through a composite $t_r$. So here is an enhanced version of the answer

Let us say $\mathbb{V}_s \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ is the smallest spherical volume such that: $$ \forall t, \qquad \forall \vec{r}\notin \mathbb{V}_s: \qquad\qquad \rho\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = 0 $$ $$ \forall t, \qquad \forall \vec{r}\in \partial\mathbb{V}_s: \qquad\qquad \rho\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \vec{J}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = 0 $$ Since $\mathbb{V}_s$ is a sphere, let us say that its center is at $\vec{r}_0$, and its diameter id $\mathcal{D}=2\mathcal{R}_s$.

Now given the definitions: $$ \vec{r}_s \in \mathbb{V}_s,\qquad \vec{R} = \vec{r} - \vec{r}_s,\qquad R=\left|\vec{R}\right|, \qquad \hat{R}=\frac {\vec{R}} {R}, \qquad t_r = t - \frac {R} {c} $$ The fields $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{B}$ are as follows: $$ \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} {\left[ \frac {\rho (\vec{r}_s, t_r)} {R^2} \hat{R} + \frac {1} {R c} \frac {\partial \rho (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \hat{R} - \frac {1} {R c^2} \frac {\partial \vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \right]} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $$ \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {\mu_0} {4 \pi} \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} {\left[ \frac {\vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r)} {R^2} \times \hat{R} + \frac {1} {R c} \frac {\partial \vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \times \hat{R} \right]} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$

The paper "The Relation Between Expressions for Time-Dependent Electromagnetic Fields Given by Jefimenko and by Panofsky and Phillips" by Kirk T. McDonald shows how the continuity equation $-\dot{\rho}=\nabla\cdot\vec{J}$ can be applied to the expression for $\vec{E}$ to transform it into: $$ \scriptsize{ \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} {\left[ \frac {\rho (\vec{r}_s, t_r)} {R^2} \hat{R} + \frac { \left(\vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) \cdot \hat{R}\right)\hat{R} + \left(\vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) \times\hat{R}\right) \times \hat{R} } {R^2 c} + \frac {1} {R c^2} \left( \frac {\partial \vec{J} (\vec{r}_s, t_r) } {\partial t} \times \hat{R} \right) \times \hat{R} \right]} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) } $$

Now given any $\vec{r}$, the maximum possible difference between the values of $\dfrac 1 R$ for any two points $\vec{r}_s \in \mathbb{V}_s$ is: $$\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{R+\mathcal{D}} = \frac{\mathcal{D}}{R\left(R+\mathcal{D}\right)} = \frac{1}{R}\cfrac{ \color{red}{\frac{\mathcal{D}}{R}}}{1+\color{red}{\frac{\mathcal{D}}{R}}}$$ Similarly, the maximum possible angle between the values of $\hat{R}$ for any two points $\vec{r}_s \in \mathbb{V}_s$ is: $$ 2\;{\tan}^{-1}\left(\frac12 \color{red} {\frac{\mathcal{D}}{R}}\right) $$ For values of $\vec{r}$ for which $R \gg \mathcal{D}$, we have $\dfrac {\mathcal{D}} R \approx 0$, and each of the two expressions above are $\approx 0$ as well. So $\dfrac 1 R$ and $\hat{R}$ become essentially independent of $\vec{r}_s$. We can, therefore, bring out all $\dfrac 1 R$ and $\hat{R}$ factors outside the integral sign.

So if we define the following: $$ W\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \rho \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $$ \vec{Y}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $$ \vec{Z}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \frac {\partial \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) } {\partial t} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) = \frac {\partial \vec{Y}\left(\vec{r},t\right)} {\partial t} $$ we can then say: $$ \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac {W (\vec{r}, t)} {R^2} \hat{R} + \frac {\vec{Y} (\vec{r}, t) \cdot \hat{R}} {R^2 c} \hat{R} + \frac {\left(\vec{Y}(\vec{r}, t) \times \hat{R}\right) \times \hat{R}} {R^2 c} + \frac {\left(\vec{Z}(\vec{r}, t) \times \hat{R}\right) \times \hat{R}} {R c^2} \right] $$ $$ \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {\mu_0} {4 \pi} \left[ \frac {\vec{Y} (\vec{r}, t) \times \hat{R}} {R^2} + \frac {\vec{Z}(\vec{r}, t) \times \hat{R}} {R c} \right] $$ Applying $\color{blue}{\left(\vec{a} \times \hat{u}\right) \times \hat{u} \equiv \left(\vec{a}\cdot\hat{u}\right)\hat{u} - \vec{a}}$, we get: $$ \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \left( \frac {W (\vec{r}, t)} {R^2} + 2\frac {\vec{Y} (\vec{r}, t) \cdot \hat{R}} {R^2 c} + \frac {\vec{Z}\left( \vec{r}, t \right)\cdot\hat{R}} {R c^2} \right) \hat{R} - \frac 1 {Rc} \left( \frac {\vec{Y} (\vec{r}, t) } {R} + \frac {\vec{Z}(\vec{r}, t)} {c} \right) \right] $$ $$ \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {\mu_0} {4 \pi} \left[ \frac 1 R {\left( \frac {\vec{Y} (\vec{r}, t)} {R} + \frac {\vec{Z}(\vec{r}, t)} {c} \right)} \times \hat{R} \right] $$ Thus, if we define: $$ \mathcal{U}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \color{blue}{ \vec{W} \left(\vec{r},t\right) + \frac {\vec{Y} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \hat{R}} {c} } = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \left[ \rho \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) + \frac { \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) \cdot \hat{R} } {c} \right] \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $$ \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) = \color{blue}{ \frac {\vec{Y} \left(\vec{r},t\right)} {R} + \frac {\vec{Z} \left(\vec{r},t\right)} {c} } = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \left[ \frac { \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) } {R} + \frac 1 c \frac {\partial \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t_r \right) } {\partial t} \right] \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ ... we get: $$ \vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac {\mathcal{U}\left(\vec{r},t\right)} {R^2} \hat{R} + \frac {\left( \vec{\mathcal{X}}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R}\right) \times \hat{R}} {Rc} \right] $$ $$ \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \frac {\mu_0} {4 \pi} \left[ \frac {\vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R}} {R} \right] $$ Finally we can compute the Poynting vector $\vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \dfrac {\vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right)} {\mu_0}$ giving us: $$ \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) = \mathcal{U} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \frac {\hat{R} \times \left( \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right) } {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^3} + \frac {\left| \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^2 c} \hat{R} $$

The first term is clearly perpendicular to $\hat{R}$, while the second term is along $\hat{R}$. If we define a sphere $\mathbb{V}$ with its center at $\vec{r}_0$ (the center of the source volume $\mathbb{V}_s$) such that point $\vec{r}$ is on its surface, then the unit vector $\hat{R}$ will actually be the unit normal (to the surface $\partial\mathbb{V}$, pointing outward) at $\vec{r}$.

The outward power flow through $\vec{r}$ is given by: $$ \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \hat{R} = \frac {\left| \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^2 c} $$ We can see that $\vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R}$ is perpendicular to $\hat{R}$, and is therefore tangential to the surface $\partial\mathbb{V}$ everywhere. By the Hairy Ball Theorem, it must be zero for at least one $\vec{r}$. The outward power flowing through $\partial\mathbb{V}$ must therefore be zero at at least one point (and not one axis, or two points, as was suspected in the question).

The total power passing the surface $\partial\mathbb{V}$ will be: $$ P\left(R,t\right) = \oint_{\partial\mathbb{V}} \vec{S}\left(\vec{r},t\right) \cdot \hat{R} \;ds\left(\vec{r}\right) = \oint_{\partial\mathbb{V}} \frac {\left| \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^2 c} \;ds\left(\vec{r}\right) $$

If we now express the vectors in spherical coordinates $\langle 0\le \mathrm{r} \lt \infty, \;0 \le \theta \le 2\pi,\; 0 \le \phi \le \pi\rangle$ with the origin at $\vec{r}_0$, this surface integral can be parameterized to become: $$ \small{ P\left(R,t\right) = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \frac {\left| \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 R^2 c} R^2 \sin \phi \;d\phi\;d\theta = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \frac {\left| \vec{\mathcal{X}} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 c}\sin \phi \;d\phi\;d\theta } $$

... which expands to: $$\small{ \frac 1 {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 c} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \frac {\left| \vec{Y} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {R^2} + 2\frac {\left( \vec{Y} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right)\cdot\left( \vec{Z} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right)} {R c} + \frac {\left| \vec{Z} \left(\vec{r},t\right) \times \hat{R} \right|^2} {c^2} \right]\;\sin \phi \;d\phi\;d\theta }$$

As $R \to\infty$, we can see that the first two terms vanish, and the term $\mathcal{P}_{\infty}$ from the question turns out to be: $$ \small{ \mathcal{P}_{\infty}\left(t\right) = \lim_{R\to\infty} P\left(R,t+ \frac R c\right) = \frac 1 {16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 c^3} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \left| \color{red}{ \vec{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\hat{R}, t\right) } \times \hat{R} \right|^2\;\sin \phi \;d\phi\;d\theta } $$

... where: $$ \vec{\mathcal{Q}}\left(\hat{R}, t\right) = \lim_{R\to\infty}\vec{Z} \left(\vec{r},t+\frac R c\right) = \iiint_{\mathbb{V}_s} \frac {\partial \vec{J} \left( \vec{r}_s, t+\frac {\left(\vec{r}_s-\vec{r}_0\right)\cdot\hat{R}} c\right) } {\partial t} \space dV\left(\vec{r}_s\right) $$ $\vec{\mathcal{Q}}$ depends on the direction $\hat{R}$, but is completely independent of the distance $R$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.