Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We're dealing with 2 electrons in a simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) potential. We're given the creation and annihilation operators as well as the position operator and I have to find the expectation value $\langle(x_2 - x_1)^2\rangle$ where $x_2$ and $x_1$ correspond to the positions of the two electrons. My problem is that I don't know how to input those two different positions into the position operator, which by the way is defined as:

$$\hat{x}_i=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\hat{a}_i+\hat{a}_i^\dagger)$$

So there you have it, I am stuck because I'm unclear on notation.

EDIT I am still stuck, I don't know what the $x_1$ or $x_2$ operators would look like. The definition above of the position operator, as I read it, is telling me that I should make the following substitution to get the $x_1$ and $x_2$ operators:

$$\hat{x}_1=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\hat{a}_1+\hat{a}_1^\dagger)$$ $$\hat{x}_2=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\hat{a}_2+\hat{a}_2^\dagger)$$

But this doesn't make a lot of sense to me, because now thelowering operator would be this:

$$\hat{a}_i\vert n \rangle_i=\sqrt{n} \vert n-1\rangle \rightarrow \hat{a}_1\vert n \rangle_1=\sqrt{n} \vert n-1\rangle$$

$$\hat{a}_i\vert n \rangle_i=\sqrt{n} \vert n-1\rangle \rightarrow \hat{a}_2\vert n \rangle_2=\sqrt{n} \vert n-1\rangle$$

And the raising operator would be this:

$$ \hat{a}_i^\dagger\vert n \rangle_i=\sqrt{n+1} \vert n+1\rangle \rightarrow \hat{a}_1\vert n \rangle_1=\sqrt{n+1} \vert n+1\rangle$$

$$\hat{a}_i^\dagger\vert n \rangle_i=\sqrt{n+1} \vert n+1\rangle \rightarrow \hat{a}_2\vert n \rangle_2=\sqrt{n+1} \vert n+1\rangle$$

which to me looks like they do exactly the same. Now someone much more knowledgeable than me said that this would be the wavefunction on which we operate:

$$\vert \Psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\lbrace\vert \Psi_0(x_1)\rangle\vert\psi_1(x_2)\rangle + \vert\Psi_0(x_2)\rangle\vert\psi_1(x_1)\rangle\rbrace $$ where $\vert\Psi_0(x_1)\rangle$ means the ground state of the first particle and $\vert\Psi_1(x_1)\rangle$ is the first excited state of the first electron, you get the idea.

So this is fine by me, I still don't know how I am to solve the problem because I don't know what $x_1$ or $x_2$ would look like nor what the difference between those operators is. Am I making sense here? I am being thrown off by subscripts, I can't see any difference between those two operators, and so I can't do the problem.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

It is not a full solution to the problem, but my two cents: In Heisenberg picture the dynamics is encoded in the observables. The evolution equation for an observable $A=A(t)$ is

$$\frac{dA(t)}{dt}=\frac{i}{\hbar}[H,A(t)]-\frac{\partial A(t)}{\partial t} $$

As you are interested in expectation values:

$$\langle\frac{dA(t)}{dt}\rangle=\langle\frac{i}{\hbar}[H,A(t)]\rangle-\langle\frac{\partial A(t)}{\partial t}\rangle $$

Being more specific $A(t)=(x_2-x_1)^2$. It is not an explicit function of the, so the partial derivative vanish. Then you have

$$\langle \frac{d(x_2-x_1)^2}{dt}\rangle=\langle \frac{i}{\hbar}[H,(x_2-x_1)^2] \rangle$$

Now write both $H$ and $(x_1-x_2)^2$ in terms of $a$ and $a^{\dagger}$ and you will have your differential equation.

What's the problem with this answer? The solution will depend on a initial condition about $(x_1-x_2)^2$

share|improve this answer

If the electrons aren't interacting, I think you can safely expand $\langle(x_2 - x_1)^2\rangle$ as

\begin{align} \langle(x_2 - x_1)^2\rangle &= \langle x_2^2 + x_1^2 - 2x_2 x_1\rangle\\ &= \langle x_2^2\rangle + \langle x_1^2\rangle -2\langle x_2\rangle\langle x_1\rangle. \end{align}

Then you can use the raising and lowering operator representation and let it act on the two body wavefunction. That should give you the right answer.

share|improve this answer
    
I am still stuck, I placed more details on the initial post. I just need to know what the operator $x_1$ would look like as opposed to $x_2$ and I think I'd be set to finally operate on the wavefunction. –  user17338 Feb 28 '13 at 23:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.