Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking into nanotubes and I thought I'd assure myself that the basic geometry equations are indeed correct. No problems for the radius, I quickly found the known formula:

$$R = \sqrt{3(n^2+m^2+nm)}\frac{d_{CC}}{2\pi}$$

if $d_{CC}$ is the carbon bond length.

For the chiral angle, however, the equation should be

$$\tan{\theta} = \frac{m\sqrt{3}}{2n+m}$$

but I got

$$\tan{\theta} = \frac{m\sqrt{3}}{2n-m},$$

a sign difference. I thought I'd look for the mistake and quickly correct it, but I cannot for the life of me find it. I'll show my derivation below. The starting point is of course the nanotube structure:

Nanotube structure

I'll simplify this picture to make it more clear what I did:

Simplified picture

From the above picture, it's easy to see that

$$\sin{\theta} = \frac{h}{na_1}$$

and

$$\sin{\left(120^{\circ} - \theta\right)} = \frac{h}{ma_2}.$$

This can be rewritten using the trigonometric identity

$$\sin{\left(\alpha-\beta\right)} = \sin{\alpha}\cos{\beta} - \cos{\alpha}\sin{\beta}$$

where $\alpha = 120^{\circ}$ and $\beta = \theta$, giving rise to

$$\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cos{\theta} + \frac{1}{2}\sin{\theta} = \frac{h}{ma_2}.$$

Now, using the fact that $a_1 = a_2 (=\sqrt{3}d_{CC})$, we find the following equations:

$$\left\{\begin{array}{rcl}n\sin{\theta} & = & \frac{h}{a_1}\\ m\left[\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cos{\theta} + \frac{1}{2}\sin{\theta}\right] & = & \frac{h}{a_1}\end{array}\right.$$

which obviously allow for combination:

$$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{n}{m}\sin{\theta} & = & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cos{\theta} + \frac{1}{2}\sin{\theta} \\ \left(\frac{n}{m}-\frac{1}{2}\right)\sin{\theta} & = & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cos{\theta} \\ \frac{2n-m}{2m}\sin{\theta} & = & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cos{\theta} \\ \tan{\theta} & = & \frac{m\sqrt{3}}{2n-m}. \end{eqnarray}$$

This differs from the known expression in that it has a minus sign in front of $m$ in the denominator, but I fail to see my mistake. It could be really silly and I'm just being blind... Thanks for taking a look at it.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The angle at $C$ is not $120^\circ-\theta$, it's $180^\circ-(120^\circ+\theta)=60^\circ-\theta$. The rest of the algebra is right, and you can quickly see where the sign comes from.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah yes! Of course, I knew it was going to be some blind spot I was having. Thank you :) –  Wouter Feb 24 '13 at 0:53
    
Sure thing. I think we've all had those kind of days, and to be fair I completely missed it on the first read through as well. –  wsc Feb 24 '13 at 2:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.