Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

One meteorite fell on the ground in Russia, last week. In different circumstances, it could have orbited the earth, or perhaps pass close to the earth and then disappear into the space. It seems that everything is continuously moving in the universe: satellites orbit planets, planets orbit stars, stellar systems orbit each other and galaxies orbit one another too, and so on. The layman (me for instance) could say that every object in the universe is either orbiting something or it is falling towards something. Physicists could argue that orbiting is just a peculiar way of falling (“falling with style”, as Woody famously said to Buzz Lightyear). Now, my first question is: is it correct to say that everything is -in a way or another- falling towards something else? And, second question, is it possible that our universe itlself is falling towards something else i.e.another universe (which could maybe explain why it is expanding at increasing speed)? Last question. How can we be sure that the Big Bang (which the layman thinks of as the hugest explosion ever) is not the moment in which a Big Falling started? Please forgive any naivtes, as this is my first post here.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Firstly, it can be easily shown that everything isn't "falling" toward everything else. For example, a photon emitted by an extremely distant star isn't "falling" toward anything. It may be affected by various things on it's way here, like interactions with electrons, or large gravitational potentials.

An other counter example is a rocket/similar body that we fire off the face of Earth, which attains escape velocity. It has escaped the gravitational attraction of the Earth, and assuming it doesn't get trapped by another object in the solar system, will continue along it's way. This isn't "falling" toward anything either.

Secondly, even though "continuous falling" is often used as an analogy for an orbit, it's far clearer to think of it in terms of potentials. My answer here explains gravitational orbits in terms of a potential. There are other answers to that question as well that do a damn good job of explaining things.

The big bang cannot be the beginning of the "big fall", since the universe is expanding. It isn't expanding in a regular manner around one fixed point, but every point is expanding away from every other point. Clearly this is the opposite of falling.

And lastly, we cannot know what is outside of our universe, therefore your question about falling into another universe is completely unanswerable. There may or may not be theories predicting other universes, but they are (as far as I know) completely un-detectable. Therefore we can never say for sure if the theory is right or wrong.

share|improve this answer
    
Many thanks Kitchi, both for your clear answer and your link. –  AldCer Feb 24 '13 at 20:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.