Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was informed that in a circuit, the current will stay the same, and this is why the lightbulbs will light up (because in order for the current to stay the same, the drift speed of the electrons need to get faster). However, I do not understand why the current needs to stay the same from point to point.

Why does the current stay the same from point to point in a circuit?

share|cite|improve this question
When you sya "the current will stay the same," do you mean that it's the same from moment to moment (ie, constant in time), or that it's the same from point to point along the current? – Colin McFaul Feb 22 '13 at 3:40
welcome to physics.SE . I have given you a +1 so you can start accumulating some reputation that will allow you to comment. You can edit your question using the "edit" link above so as to clarify what Colin asked you.. – anna v Feb 22 '13 at 8:07
Sounds like chapter 19 of the third edition of Matter & Interactions by Chabay and Sherwood. It also sounds like you haven't read the chapter, because your question is addressed very early on in the reading material. Read it again VERY carefully, remembering that fundamentally, current is counting electrons drifting past a given point in a one second duration. – user11266 Mar 10 '13 at 22:55

Electrons are present everywhere in an electric circuit. When a potential difference is applied to the circuit, an electric field is set up throughout the circuit, almost with the speed of light. Electrons in every part of the circuit begin to drift under the influence of this electric field and a current begins to flow in the circuit immediately.

You have to note here that if the potential difference you're applying is constant as with a D.C battery the electric field remains constant, and thus the current remains constant.

share|cite|improve this answer
The person with lowest number of  \$ $ \$  was the only one who wrote something on topic. Not so surprising for me… – Incnis Mrsi Oct 25 '14 at 7:43

The current doesn't necessarily remain constant in time in a circuit. For a simple example, consider a so-called $LC$-circuit. In this circuit consisting of an inductor and a capacitor in series, the current oscillates with angular frequency $$ \omega = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}} $$ were $L$ is the inductance of the inductor, and $C$ is the capacitance of the capacitor. In fact, the $LC$-circuit is a simple example of a more general class of circuits called AC or "alternating current" circuits where the current is a periodically changing function of time.

Having said this, there are many circuits in which the current doesn't change much once the system is in the steady state. A circuit consisting of a lightbulb (which is basically just a resistor) connected in series to a battery is a simple example. In this case the current $I$ satisfied Ohm's law and is given by $$ I = \frac{V}{R} $$ where $V$ is the voltage of the battery and $R$ is the resistance of the bulb.

share|cite|improve this answer

The original poster explained unambiguously that the question is about spatial dependence, not temporal, i.e. a partial case of the Kirchhoff’s current law was interested about.

Tiny electrons are not things providing high-level integrity of electric circuits; they are only charge carriers. It is a good metaphor: when you send a mail, you do not care about carriers and their speed; you care about integrity of mail and terms of delivery. For an explanation how this integrity is ensured along a non-branching circuit read Why isn't resistance proportional to distance squared

share|cite|improve this answer

The current flows in the wires of a circuit, carried by the movement of electrons. At any particular time, if you measure the current at two different places in the same wire, you will get the same reading. This is Kirchhoff's current law in action: all the current entering a point in a circuit must leave that point. Any point on your wire can be seen as a 'node' with two current paths leaving it.

One way to look at this is to think of the flow of current through a wire similar to water flowing in a pipe. (I actually detest this analogy, but it's simple enough.) If you measure the flow at two different points in the same pipe, the readings will be the same, as long as you are looking at the volume of water passing per unit time, in whatever units you want, cubic meters per second, for example. Unless there's a leak, the water has to go through the pipe. The same goes for the electrons: unless there's a fault or a short, the electrons have to go through the wire.

share|cite|improve this answer

Look into Kirchoff's current law.

It is simply charge conservation. If a current of 2 C/s flows in, then 2 C/s must flow out. Because charge is not accumulated anywhere. Inflow must equal outflow at every single point in a steady circuit. Mathematically:

$$\sum I=0 \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad \sum I_{in}-\sum I_{out}=0$$

  • When you in a series circuit have only one path, then the whole current has to leave along this path. So the current entering the next point on the path is still the original current. Through the entire circuit, the current is therefore the same at any point.
  • In a parallel circuit a path might split into two, so the incoming current can be split and smaller portions take each path - in total the sum must be zero at any point, so now the current along each path is not necessarily the same. This is how current flow can be controlled.
share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.