Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is second-order covariant derivative $$\nabla_i\nabla_jf(r)$$ in terms of $r,\theta, g(r)$ and partial derivative, given that the metric takes the form $$ds^2=dr^2+g(r)d\theta^2$$ and $f$ is a scalar function of $r$?

For Cartesians, I know that the covariant derivatives reduce to partial derivatives. However, since this is in polar coordinates...

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The covariant derivative of a scalar is just its gradient because scalars don't depend on your basis vectors:

$$\nabla_j f=\partial_jf$$

Now it's a dual vector, so the next covariant derivative will depend on the connection. Assuming the Levi-Civita connection, i.e. the Christoffel symbols, the covariant derivative will be:

$$\nabla_i \nabla_j f=\nabla_i \partial_jf=\partial_i \partial_j f-\partial_k f~\Gamma^{k}_{ij}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much, elfmotat. I have a further question: isn't the Levi-Civita connection built into e definition of the covariant derivative? Is an extra assumption required? -- I may have got something confused. Thanks again! – Harrold Feb 21 '13 at 22:27
In GR the connection is assumed to be torsion-free, so the Levi-Civita connection is all that is discussed in most introductory texbooks. Other connections are possible though, and the covariant derivative depends on the type of connection. If you're just learning GR then you don't really need to worry about any of that though. – jld Feb 21 '13 at 22:36
Thank you very much! :) – Harrold Feb 22 '13 at 0:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.