If electric field lines cannot terminate in empty space, in the simple example of two equal charges what happens to the line starting from one of the charges toward the other in the middle?
Tell me more
×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
||||
|
|
There are in fact two field lines that depart each charge headed towards the other. These lines meet at the origin (the mid-point of the two charges), where the field is zero, and vanish there. There are also two other lines, which are born at the origin and depart along the vertical axis. Thus, formally, two lines go in and two lines go out, so no lines actually die in empty space. These lines are actually a limiting case of lines that leave the point charges at a small angle $\epsilon$ from the intercharge axis; these lines make increasingly close approaches to the origin as $\epsilon\rightarrow0$, and then they shoot off to infinity, increasingly close to the vertical axis. (If you're sharp, you'll notice there's actually an infinity of such lines, since there's also lines that go off perpendicularly to the screen and at any angle in between. Thus my "two-for-two" argument is not actually quite right. Can you see the limiting behaviour that makes it right?) Pictures of this were relatively hard to find, but you can see them in this Wolfram web app:
You also have to consider one key point: at the origin, the field is zero, so actually there should be no field lines through it. Or, more formally, the density of field lines should be zero. This comes about in that the angle $\epsilon$ should be really small for the lines to actually approach the origin. You should then plaster the diagram with lines leaving equiangularly at angle $\epsilon$ from each charge, and that will mean a lot of lines on the "outside" of the charges. Ultimately, though, the lesson is that individual field lines are not that important, and it is the set of lines, equiangularly leaving the charges (in 3D!), that makes a physically relevant diagram. And even then, field line diagrams are only of limited utility in understanding electric fields, mostly because they only incorporate with the utmost difficulty the superposition principle, which is at the real heart of classical electromagnetism. |
|||||
|
|
This:
Which I borrowed from: enter link description here The lines go off to infinity and never terminate. EDIT: As per your comment, you seem to be asking about the difference between an electric field of each point charge, and the net electric field of both. If you draw the electric field lines of one point charge Q, then they just point radially outwards. Now if you draw another point charge q on that same picture, then there will be an electric field line that 'goes through' that second point charge q. The relevance of this picture is that this is the electric field of Q and q will feel a force given by $\vec{F}_{on q} = q \vec{E}_{of Q}$. However, if you draw the $\bf{net}$ electric field of 2 equal point charges, then it will look like the picture above. |
|||||||||||
|
