Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm starting to learn about gauge theories and Goldstone bosons. What does it mean for a group to be gauged?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Begin with theory of fields $\phi$ on a manifold $M$ with target space $V$ (which we take to be a vector space in this discussion) $$ \phi:M\to V $$ that exhibits a global symmetry under some group $G$. This means that there is a representation $\rho$ of the group $G$ acting on the target space $V$ under whose action the theory is invariant, in other words the transformation $$ \phi(x) \to \rho(g)\phi(x) $$ is an invariance of the theory. By gauging the group, we mean that we allow for transformations of the fields under this representation for which the group element $g$ depends on the point $x$ on the manifold where we are applying the transformation; $$ \phi(x)\to\rho(g(x))\phi(x) $$ Such a transformation is called local. We now look to see how we can modify the theory (the standard way is to include an auxiliary field called a gauge field along with a gauge covariant derivative) such that the new theory exhibits invariance under these local transformations. The result is a gauge theory.

share|cite|improve this answer

It means that instead of global transformations

$ \Psi(x,t) \rightarrow U \Psi(x,t) $

for some group element $U$, you allow local transformations

$ \Psi(x,t) \rightarrow U(x,t) \Psi(x,t) $

where $U(x,t)$ is a space-time dependent group transformation. Any textbook on quantum field theory will go into detail about the implications of this. :) A free pre-publication version of Srednicki's (pretty good) book is available here if you don't already have access to one.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1: My apologies for the duplicate answer; I was too far in not to post when I saw your answer had posted. – joshphysics Feb 18 '13 at 0:57
@joshphysics No worries – Michael Brown Feb 18 '13 at 1:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.