Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have just gone through the exercise of constructing the supersymmetrized QED action.

In the end, I get a reasonable action which matches literature. But after a little analysis, I find that the supersymmetrized gauge interactions (electron-selectron-photino vertices) seem to violate CP. In the two-component Weyl notation, this is:

$$\mathcal{L}_\text{int}=\ldots+\sqrt{2}e(\phi_Le_L^\dagger\lambda^\dagger+\phi_L^*e_L\lambda)-\sqrt{2}e(\phi_R e_R^\dagger\lambda^\dagger+\phi_R^*e_R\lambda)$$

Where $\lambda$ is the gaugino, $\Phi_L=(\phi_L,e_L)$ is a left chiral superfield with charge $-1$, and $\Phi_R=(\phi_R,e_R)$ is the Dirac-partner chiral superfield with charge $+1$.

I am assuming, that under $CP$, the two chiral superfields transform into one another:

$$CP:\qquad\Phi_L\leftrightarrow\Phi_R$$

Question: Is my analysis correct? Is is really true that supersymmetric QED violates CP?

Edit: I just realized that in my construction I assumed that $m$ in the superpotential ($m\phi_R\phi_L$) is real. It seems to me that more generally, it is allowed to be complex...

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I am in error. The supersymmetric gauge interactions displayed in my original post does not violate CP. The error is in the transformation rule I gave above. Under CP, the chiral superfields should transform:

$$CP:\qquad \Phi_L\rightarrow\Phi_L^*,\enspace \Phi_R\rightarrow\Phi_R^*$$

Therefore these interactions only violate P. This is something that I can come to grips with (rather than CP violation). It would be nice to get a double check on my claim.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.