Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We start with the metric tensor \begin{equation} g_{\mu\nu}(x) = \eta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu}(x) \end{equation} in the linearised theory, or \begin{equation} g_{\mu\nu}(x) = \bar{g}_{\mu\nu}(x) + h_{\mu\nu}(x) \end{equation} in the more general case with a curved background. However, in both cases, we apparently need \begin{equation} \vert h_{\mu\nu}\vert \ll 1. \end{equation} This condition demands that the components of the perturbation are much less than 1, in the coordinate system where the components of the background metric tensor are of order 1. Why do we need this condition?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

In order to do perturbation the expansion parameter needs to be small. Otherwise the the system will be strongly coupled and you're in the non-perturbative regime. It's the same as for instance in QM: for perturbative calculations the pertubation must be small.

share|cite|improve this answer
Additionally, once you calculate the results -- you find that, indeed, h << 1 – DilithiumMatrix Feb 13 '13 at 20:58
Equations for $g$ are non linear and impossible to solve analytically. $h_{\mu\nu}$ is not supposed to be small, but it is normally small (it can be shown numerically) and then linearization reduces equations to solvable ones. – Vladimir Kalitvianski Feb 13 '13 at 21:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.