Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the material for optical focusing that produces the less diffraction losses?

Suppose one have a sequence of serial optical elements $R$ that keep refocusing a beam of collimated light, each a distance $D$. Now suppose that the wavelength $\lambda$, the optical element and the distance are such that the $\epsilon$ is the amount of radiation that falls outside the next optical element, which i'll take to be small.

I'm concerned with other losses in this system, for instance, the optical material can have some intrinsic diffusion, or it absorbs a portion of the radiation

What are the main losses that an optical element can have of this kind, and which are the best refocusing optical elements that minimise those losses?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted
  • If you use lenses to refocus a beam, with high quality optics, the limiting factor will most likely be the quality of the anti-reflection coatings of your lenses and not the absorption or scattering from their optical material (at least for visible/NIR light). It's not easy to lose less than 0.1% per surface from Fresnel reflections.

  • If you are desperate to get the smallest losses possible, then you may want to use a refocusing system that involves mirrors. Losses while reflecting of a dielectric mirror can be less than 0.01%, taking into account scattering, absorption and transmission.

share|cite|improve this answer

You can also use Diffractive Optical Elements (AKA Holographic OE) implemented as phase plates. This, to start, provide a uniform reflection-loss transversal profile, as they are flat. They are also thin, so if you are considering bulk absorption, too many elements, etc., this may help. In the cons side... you need monochromatic light.

But I think this does not answer, as doesn't @Oli's post. One approach is to make your lenses have long focal lenghts. This provides small divergences, reducing the intensity falling out of next elements. The beam shape is also very important. We usually think in a Gaussian beam, that has a non zero intensity in the whole transversal space. You may be interested in something like non diffractive modes (like ideal Bessel beams).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.