Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When particles mass can be changed by changing the website, then how to calculate with confidence?

For example: Google: electron mass = 9.10938 188 × 10$^-31$ kilograms

Wikipedia: electron mass

9.109 38 2 15(45) ×10$^−31$ kg

5.485 799 0943(23)×10$^−4$ u

8.187 104 38(41)×10$^−14$ J/c$^2$

0.510 998 910(13) MeV/c$^2$

The difference is small, but it makes little difference in accuracy.

share|cite|improve this question
wikipedia in the electron entry 9.10938291(40)×10−31 kg 9.10938291(40)×10−31 kg . They are all the same within errors, and the errors come from various experiments measuring the mass with an error. no problem, that is why errors are important to be quoted – anna v Feb 11 '13 at 18:03
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The NIST web site gives the electron mass as 9.10938291 $\pm$ 0.00000040 $\times$ 10$^{-31}$ kg. The 0.00000040 is a single standard deviation, so Google's value, 9.10938188 $\times$ 10$^{-31}$ kg is (just) within three standard deviations. The figures aren't that different.

I can't see any indication on the Google site where they get their value for the electron mass, but I would believe the NIST above an uncredited figure from Google.

share|cite|improve this answer

This is science, new measurements happen.

Obviously you go to the newest and most authoritative source you can get. As far as I am concerned that is the latest edition of the Particle Data Book which says the correct figure is $0.510998928 \pm 0.000000011\text{ MeV}$.

That said, I notice that the differences you list about are in the eight and ninth digits. Do you have any idea how hard it is to build anything well enough understood that those differences won't be completely lost in the noise of other uncorrected effects?

share|cite|improve this answer
PDG = boss. That is all. – user12345 Feb 12 '13 at 0:04

Wolfram Alpha

$$9.10938\times 10^{-31}\mathrm{kg}$$

Wiki Pedia

$$9.10938291 \times 10^{-31}\mathrm{kg}$$


$$9.10938291\times10^{-31} \mathrm{kg}$$

The difference seems to have disappeared now.

Anyway, the possible explanation I see is that the experimental papers involved may have either

  1. Measured differently (buh. obviously,.)

  2. Used different definitions of the kilogram (sort - of a manmade unit.).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.