Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When reading about the Big Bang, I see phrases like 3 trillionths of a second after... So, what was ticking to give a time scale like this? We define time now in terms of atomic oscillations, but these effects occurred before there were any atoms, or anything else, oscillating to give a reference to measure time against.

A similar question has already been posted, but the esoteric answers there do not give me a way of visualising what information these time intervals are really intended to convey.

share|cite|improve this question
"We define time now in terms of atomic oscillations," We define units of time in terms of atomic oscillations. That's subtly different. Nothing fundamentally prevents us from measuring length of time less than those oscillations, and indeed we measure things like the lifetimes of hadronic states to times very much shorter than a single oscillation of any atomic system. – dmckee Feb 11 '13 at 16:42
Thank you Qmechanic for your answer. I am sorry for my loose use of "time", but that is not really the point. Perhaps I should have asked how, say, a millisecond immediately after the Big Bang, which I cannot visualise, relates to a millisecond today, which as an amateur radio licensee, I am happily familiar with. – Harry Weston Feb 12 '13 at 10:41
Sorry, got the thanks wrong, should have been: thank you Qmechanic for the edits, and dmckee for the answer. – Harry Weston Feb 12 '13 at 14:35
It is a slightly different question to ask if time meant the same thing in the early epochs as it does now. I believe that it can be show exactly back to shortly after the CMB decoupled and there is no reason to assume anything else for earlier epochs. – dmckee Feb 12 '13 at 16:26

As dmckee points out in his comment on your question - There's a difference between defining a unit of time, and defining time.

There are several ways to define our units of time. We could define it in terms of atomic transitions or in terms of distant stars or from pulsars or from the sun.

These are all different ways of measuring time for different purposes. But we can always imagine breaking up time into arbitrarily small chunks. By this I mean we don't as yet know whether time and space themselves are fundamentally quantized or if there is another physical limitation which will make measuring arbitrarily small units of time and space impossible. So in theory, we can always hypothesize what will happen at infinitesimally incremental times.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.