Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am following Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, as well as an online lecture that follows a different book, and both sources give different equations for the general solution of the 1-D Schrodinger equation for a free particle.

Griffiths has it as: $$\Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi(k) e^{ i\left(kx-\frac{hk^2}{2m}t\right)}dk\tag1$$

The online lecture has it as:$$\Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi\hbar}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}a(p) e^{ \frac{i}{\hbar}\left(px-\frac{p^2}{2m}t\right)}dp\tag2$$

The most glaring addition to the second equation is the $\hbar$ under the square root sign. Given this, I can't see how they're both equivalent.

The link to the online lecture is

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Consider making the substitution $k = p/\hbar$ in the first expression, while simultaneously defining $$ \sqrt{\hbar} \,a(p) = \phi(k) $$ then the first integral will become $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \sqrt{\hbar}\, a(p) e^{i\left(\frac{p}{\hbar} x - \frac{\hbar}{2m}\frac{p^2}{\hbar^2}t\right)} \frac{dp}{\hbar} $$ which is exactly the second integral. It's just a change of notation!

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.