That is not correct. There is no reason for the x position to be linearly proportional to the x-velocity. In fact, because you know the motion is circular, you also know that when the x-position is at a maximum, the x-velocity is zero.
Because you have the correct expression for the orbital radius, and you know that the angular velocity is constant (assuming the magnetic field is constant), you can easily express the answer in polar coordinates, $\vec{R} = \left(R,\theta(t) \right)$.
In general, however, to find the position vector you would need to solve the differential equations of motion, where the force is provided by the lorentz force, i.e.
$ F_L = m\frac{dv}{dt} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}$.
Edit:
As the OP posted in the comments, $F_x = q v_y B$ and $F_y = -q v_x B$, i.e.
$F_x: \frac{dv_x}{dt} = v_y \frac{qB}{m}$
$F_y: \frac{dv_y}{dt} = -v_x \frac{qB}{m}$
The next step is to try to find general expressions for $v_x$ and $v_y$. Again, it's best to use your knowledge of the general behavior of the solution (i.e. circular motion) to make a guess: try, something like $v_x = A\cos{\omega t}$. Using that, what do you get for $v_y$? Once you have both velocities, how can you find the $x,y$ positions?