Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I just want to know the differences between these two formulas:

$h = h_0 + v_0 t ± \frac{1}{2} g t^2$


$y = y_0 + v_{0y} t + \frac{1}{2} g t^2$

Also, how are these called in English?

share|cite|improve this question
The formulas are the same, just using a different variable to represent position. That is, y or h. My initial guess was that the top formula was horizontal, and the bottom was vertical, but if so, the top formula should have an A, instead of a g. – Mew Feb 4 '13 at 23:49
They are called kinematics formulas. – joshphysics Feb 4 '13 at 23:53
They are also commonly called SUVAT equations - – John Rennie Feb 5 '13 at 8:01
up vote 1 down vote accepted

As far as I can tell, the two formulas look the same. In english, we write these formulas as:

In the horizontal (or x-direction):

$x = x_0 + v_{0x}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2$, where $x$ represents distance in the horizontal direction, $x_0$ represents the initial distance, $v_{0x}$ is the initial velocity in the x-direction (sometimes instead written as $u_x$) and finally $a$ is the acceleration in the horizontal direction.

Similarly, we have for the vertical, or y-direction:

$y = y_0 + v_{0y}t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2$

Notice I have replaced $a$ with $g$, since in most problems, the acceleration in the y-direction is due to gravity, so $a=g$.

These equations are referred to as "kinematic equations" along with these additional formulas:

$v^2 = u^2 + 2as$ and $v = u + at$.

share|cite|improve this answer
h also could represent the height above a surface which is probably why g was still in it. – tpg2114 Feb 5 '13 at 1:08
Yes, h represents the height. Also, when I asked the names I meant the formula's name, I guess the first one is "vertical position as a function of time", but I don't know the second, could it be the same? – Adami Feb 5 '13 at 1:53
based on what you have said, both formulas are identical. They both have the same name. – Mew Feb 5 '13 at 2:27
@Chris so why in the first one I can user positive or negative gravity (pointing up or down) and in the other just positive? – Adami Feb 5 '13 at 11:03
@Adami: No, the direction of g does not depend on the direction your ball is moving. It only depends on the orientation of your chosen set of coordinate axes. – RedGrittyBrick Feb 5 '13 at 18:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.