Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently studying electric potential, and I'm having trouble with one of the problems on my homework:

A) A point particle with charge $+q$ is on the x-axis at a distance $d$ from the origin, and another point particle with charge $-q$ is on the x-axis at a distance $-d$ from the origin. Assuming the potential is 0 at large distances from these point particles, show that the potential is also 0 everywhere on the $x=0$ plane.

B) If an infinite grounded flat metal plate is on the $x=0$ plane, the negative charge is removed, and the electric potential is 0 in the same cases as in part (A), the potential function $V$ and the electric field $\vec{E}$ for this part is the same as in part (A). Using this result, find $\vec{E}$ at every point in the $x=0$ plane.

For part A, I simply did $V = \frac{kq}{r} + \frac{k(-q)}{r} = 0$, since the distance from the two particles to any point on the $x=0$ plane is the same for both particles.

However, this presents a problem with part B. What I found was $E = \frac{kq}{r^2} + \frac{k(-q)}{r^2} = 0$ using the same logic that I did for part A, which disagrees with the book's answer of $\frac{2kdq}{(d^2+r^2)^{3/2}}$. That looks like the formula for the electrical field of a ring, but I don't see the particular relevance here. What am I doing wrong?

share|cite|improve this question

You are forgetting that the electric field is a vector quantity! Draw a diagram, and you will see that although the components on the $x=0$ plane of the electric fields of the two charges cancel each other, the components in the $x$-direction do not, and in fact they add and have the precisely the same magnitude and direction (hence the factor of 2). Also, be careful because

  1. The $r$ is their formula is the distance to the origin of the point being considered, not the distance to the charge

  2. When you find the field component in the $x$-direction, you need to make sure to multiply its magnitude by the appropriate $\cos\theta$ factor (again draw a diagram to see what you mean)

Since this is a homework question, I didn't want to give you the full solution, but I hope this helps! Let me know if you're still confused, and I can attempt to add more detail!


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.