Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The radiance equation is $$ L = \frac{d}{dA} \frac{2(\phi)}{dW cos(\theta)} (watt/srm^2) $$ where $\phi$ is the flux.

I am thinking, should not be the cosine term on the numerator instead of the denominator? Having the cosine in the denominator will make L goes to infinity if $\theta = 90$ , which does not make sense to me. My understanding is that if $\theta = 90$ (i.e. flux direction is perpendicular to the surface normal), then $L$ should equal to zero (and not infinity).

share|improve this question
1  
Hi Khaled. Physics.SE allows MathJax, so your equations turn out nice and pretty. Have a look at the faq for more info on how to use it. I'll fix your equation for you, but I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say, so you may have to correct it. – Kitchi Jan 31 at 12:50

1 Answer

The formula correctly reflects the definition of radiance, so it's certainly correct in this sense. Is such a definition useful? I guess so - the value defined in this way gives some idea of "brightness" of the source, and "brightness" does tend to infinity when the angle tends to 90 deg - the same flux comes from a very small "perceived" area.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.