Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I came across many recommendations for both of these books, but I'm not sure which one should I use to study calculus...

I know most of the methods used in calculus and I use them frequently, but I'm shooting for mathematical physics and I was wondering which of these books would be better for someone aiming for something which is both mathematically rigorous and written in a good style for a physicist.

Also, if there is some other book that fits the description, I would appreciate the recommendation! :)

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Manishearth May 2 '13 at 23:30

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Is your "or" exclusive? Why not use both! –  MBN Jan 29 '13 at 11:39
My "or" is definitely inclusive if both books are excellent! –  Schlomo Jan 29 '13 at 11:51
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/193/2451 and links therein. –  Qmechanic Jan 29 '13 at 13:57
This is a confusing question, since both authors have written multiple well-known books, including a physics book by Spivak. –  Mark Eichenlaub Jan 29 '13 at 15:52
I'm sorry for not being more specific, I thought it would be obvious since both of them wrote a book simply titled "Calculus" :) –  Schlomo Jan 29 '13 at 19:42