Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So, this is how the problem looks:

Plus, the pulley is suspended on a cord at its center and hanging from the ceiling.

You're given masses of the objects, mass of the pulley and it's radius. And your assumptions are that the string is massless and inelastic and that there is no friction between the string and the pulley. You have to find the tension in the string suspending the pulley (it's not drawn in this particular figure).

My conclusion was that, since there is no friction between the string and the pulley, the tension would have to be equal all along the string's length and the pulley would not rotate, it would slip and there would be no way to transfer the linear motion of the masses to the rotational motion of the pulley. (The resulting torque would be zero.)

So, according to me, the tension in the string suspending the pulley would simply be the tension along the rope multiplied by two.

But the solution includes a rotating pulley and its rotational inertia... and it gives a different answer...

Where did I go wrong? And why? If not, how can I prove I'm right?

share|cite|improve this question
your analysis is right, assuming no friction between the string and the pulley. It seems that the question is contradicting itself by saying that there's no friction, yet assumes that there is. why don't you try working out the answer in the case with friction so the pulley rotates w/o slipping? – nervxxx Jan 28 '13 at 14:10
Thank you, I just needed a sanity check from somebody! You're never too sure! Yeah, I've worked it out and it's the same answer... I don't even understand why would anyone give a problem of this kind, since the system is in such configuration that it could actually be answer painfully trivially by simply adding up the weights... – Schlomo Jan 28 '13 at 14:38
To re-iterate: Without friction the pulley cannot rotate. The rope will just slip towards the heavier mass. – ja72 Jan 28 '13 at 20:31
Raga Raga: yes the tension in the spring suspending the pulley in the frictionless case would be twice the tension in the rope, but that's not equal to the sum of the weights as your comment suggests... but since you got the correct expression for the case with friction I presume it's just a misunderstanding on my part – nervxxx Jan 30 '13 at 5:43
You're absolutely right, the sum of the weights wouldn't be twice the tension in the rope suspending the two objects, it would that, plus the weight of the pulley, I didn't notice I forgot to say that! – Schlomo Jan 30 '13 at 9:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.