Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let us denote by $X^i=(1,\vec 0)$ the Killing vector field and by $u^i(s)$ a tangent vector field of a geodesic, where $s$ is some affine parameter.

What physical significance do the scalar quantity $X_iu^i$ and its conservation hold? If any...? I have seen this in may books and exam questions. I wonder what it means...

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

In general, if $\xi^\mu$ is a Killing vector field on a spacetime, and if $u^\mu$ is a tangent field along a geodesic, then it is true that $\xi_\mu u^\mu$ is a conserved quantity along the geodesic. (See for example Wald's GR proposition C.3.1). To illustrate the physical significance of this, let's take, for example, a particle moving in $2$-dimensional Minkowski space with metric

$ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2$

This metric admits killing vectors $\xi_{(t)} = (1,0)$ and $\xi_{(x)} = (0,1)$. It follows that for a geodesic $(t(\lambda),x(\lambda))$ with tangent $u^\mu(\lambda)=(dt/d\lambda, dx/d\lambda)$ we obtain two conserved quantities

$\xi_{(t)}^\mu u_\mu = -\frac{dt}{d\lambda}$

$\xi_{(x)}^\mu u_\mu = \frac{dx}{d\lambda}$

If we imagine that our geodesic represents the path of a particle of mass $m$ through spacetime, then if we choose the parameter $\lambda$ to be arc length, which for timelike curves is called proper time $\tau$, namely if we choose

$-1 = u^\mu u_\mu = \left(\frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dx}{d\tau}\right)^2$

then $p^\mu = m u^\mu$ is the four-momentum of the particle, and the conservation equation obtained from $\xi_{(t)}$ gives conservation of $p^t = m u^t$, which is the energy of the particle, and the conservation equation obtained from $\xi_{(x)}$ gives conservation of $p^x = m u^x$ which is the momentum of the particle. So in this context, Killing vectors of the given metric gave conserved quantities that could be interpreted as the energy and momentum of a particle moving freely in that spacetime.

Please let me know if there are any errors!

Cheers!

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, Josh! :) –  Fernandez Jan 25 '13 at 1:54
    
You want a subscript $x$ for on the third equation. –  kηives Jan 25 '13 at 2:28
    
@kηives Thanks. –  joshphysics Jan 25 '13 at 3:34
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.