Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I just need clarification, that is, to see that I'm doing the right thing.

When calculating central charge for certain metric, I need to solve an integral that contains Lie brackets etc. And I have some expression, that contains terms like:

$$\xi_\sigma D^\nu h^{\mu\sigma}$$

Where $D_\nu$ should be covariant derivative. Now, can I just say:

$$D^\nu=g^{\nu\mu}D_\mu$$

And similarly for the $h^{\mu\sigma}$, and use the standard definition of covariant derivatives?

share|improve this question
1  
Just a small point : One can define $D^{\nu}$ either as $D^{\nu}F=g^{\nu\mu}D_{\mu}F$ or as $D^\nu F=D_{\mu} (g^{\nu\mu}F)$ because covariant derivative of metric itself is zero. –  user10001 Jan 22 '13 at 20:34
    
Hmm, but what if I have $D_\mu h^{\sigma\nu}$, and I need to lower the indices of the $h^{\sigma\nu}$, does that mean, that I can put the g's that will lower the indices of h outside also? –  dingo_d Jan 23 '13 at 7:35
    
Yes, you are right. You can put your $g$'s anywhere inside or outside of covariant derivative. –  user10001 Jan 23 '13 at 10:29
    
Hmmm, thanks, that could help, I hope :D –  dingo_d Jan 23 '13 at 10:36
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes, that is generally what it means. Typically, it also implies that any derivatives appearing are with respect to covariant coordinates instead of contravariant.

share|improve this answer
    
"Typically, it also implies that any derivatives appearing are with respect to covariant components instead of contravariant." What if I have mixed terms inside? I mean, in the expression I also have scalars, covariant vectors, contravariant vectors, covariant and contravariant tensors... –  dingo_d Jan 22 '13 at 16:23
1  
Sorry, meant to say covariant coordinates. The ranks and makeup of the objects you're acting on with the covariant derivative don't really matter; it's just their position dependence that needs to be accounted for. In practice, having $D^a$ is just going to add an index upstairs to everything it acts on, and otherwise, you don't worry about it. –  Muphrid Jan 22 '13 at 16:26
    
Thanks for the clarification, I'll try to make sth out of this expression :D –  dingo_d Jan 22 '13 at 16:30
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.