Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could somebody please explain something regarding the Nordstrom metric?

In particular, I am referring to the last part of question 3 on this sheet -- about the freely falling massive bodies.

My thoughts: The gravitational effects would be significant since for a massive body, the geodesic is timelike. There woud thus be a $\eta^{\mu\delta}\partial_\delta \phi \dot x^\beta \dot x_\beta$ is not of the form $f(\lambda)\dot x^\mu$ so the affine parametrization does not eliminate this term containing the gravitational potential $\phi$.

Does this argument make any sense at all? Also, what more can I say about the geodesics of such massive particles?


share|cite|improve this question
I did a quick Google and found loads of stuff about geodesics in Nordstrom gravity ... – John Rennie Jan 22 '13 at 10:08
@JohnRennie: Yes, but I haven't been able to find anything directly addressing my problem. – hetherson Jan 22 '13 at 10:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.