Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like to express the wave functions for three identical particles, each with orbital angular momentum $L=1$ and spin angular momentum $S=1/2$, in terms of single-particle wave functions. In other words, I would like to obtain the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for this problem.

The problem is discussed in Sakurai's Quantum Mechanics textbook around p. 375 and in Greiner and Muller's "Quantum Mechanics: Symmetries, 2nd Edition" on p. 300. I know I have to find the spin wave functions and the orbital angular momentum wave functions separately, and then combine them to get fully antisymmetric wave functions. I have the spin wave functions (four symmetric, 2 mixed symmetric under exchange of particles 1 and 2, and 2 mixed antisymmetric under exchange of 1 and 2), but I haven't been able to get a small enough number of angular momentum wave functions to get just 20 fully-antisymmetric total wave functions.

In Sakurai's book, p 376, eq'n (6.5.20), we see that the 20 states can be decomposed into 2 states with total angular momentum $j=1/2$, 4*3=12 with $j=3/2$, and 6 with $j=5/2$. Could anyone fill in how Sakurai got 6 for $j=5/2$, 12 for $j=3/2$, and 2 for $j=1/2$?

Most importantly, referring to my comments on Y Macdisi's answer below, could anyone answer the following question: Is the orbital angular momentum state with single particle wave functions $\alpha=1$, $\beta=0$, and $\gamma=0$ related in some way to the wave function with $\alpha=-1$, $\beta=0$, and $\gamma=0$, or $\alpha=1$, $\beta=-1$, and $\gamma=-1$, and so on? I would love it if I could just keep the first set of values for $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$, but I see no good reason to do that.

If anyone happens to know where this problem is discussed more fully, I would appreciate a reference. Or, if anyone knows how to do this, I would appreciate help in knowing what the $j=3/2$ and $j=5/2$ states could be in terms of single-particle orbital ang. momentum states and spin states. I think I actually have the normalization factors already, I just need to know what the single-particle states are.

share|improve this question
1  
Just for the record, I don't have Sakurai in front of me, but I think you are reading the problem incorrectly - 2 identical fermions can't be in the same state, let alone 3. You probably mean 3 different fermions in the $S_z = +\frac{1}{2}$ state. Like an up, down and strange quark, or something to that effect. –  DJBunk Jan 21 '13 at 20:05
    
Sorry, where did I say two or more of these fermions were in the same state? I am well aware of the Pauli exclusion principle, and, looking over my question, I can't see where I wrote anything to suggest that. Thank you for responding, whatever the case. –  Impossibear Jan 21 '13 at 22:10
    
In Greiner and Muller, I'm referring to problem 9.1 on p. 300. This problem gives you the basis functions of the permutation group $S_3$ in terms of single-particle wavefunctions $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$. –  Impossibear Jan 21 '13 at 22:53
    
I just wasn't sure what you meant by 'identical particles' except for same state? –  DJBunk Jan 21 '13 at 23:10
    
By identical, I meant indistinguishable, I guess. Sorry for the confusion, but identical is the terminology used in every reference I've found on the problem so far. –  Impossibear Jan 21 '13 at 23:46
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

The L=1 rep is a 3 dimensional irep of $SU(2)$; the S=1/2 rep is a 2 dimensional irep. Combining angular momentum (L=1) and spin (S=1/2) gives the tensor product rep $3 \otimes 2$ which is 6 dimensional. You are looking for the third exterior product of this : $A^3(3 \otimes 2)$ which is 20 dimensional and decomposes into $6 \oplus 4 \oplus 4 \oplus 4 \oplus 2$ irreps. These correspond to j=5/2,3/2,3/2,3/2,1/2 .

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, Y Macdisi. I should be more specific, reading your response: Would the $j=5/2$ have to be $L_{tot}=2$, $S_{tot}=1/2$? If so, I can't see how one gets just 6 states, from the work done in Greiner and Muller's book. Would the $j=3/2$ be $L_{tot}=1$, $S_{tot}=1/2$ (for 10 of the 12), or $L_{tot}=0$, $S_{tot}=3/2$ (for 2 of the 12)? If so, I can't see how to get exactly 10 states from my $L_{tot}=1$ wavefunctions, in terms of single particle momentum states $|\pm1\rangle$ or $|0\rangle$. There just seem to be too many possible choices of single-particle angular momentum states. –  Impossibear Jan 22 '13 at 15:28
    
By the way, from Greiner and Muller's book, it seems there are two mixed symmetric and two mixed antisymmetric wave functions, expressed in terms of single particle wavefunctions $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$, where each of $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$ can take on the values $|+1\rangle$, $|0\rangle$, or $|-1\rangle$. For instance, the two orthonormal wavefunctions which are symmetric under exchange of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the following: $1/2 \psi_1 = 1/2\left[\alpha\beta\gamma + \beta\alpha\gamma-\gamma\beta\alpha-\gamma\alpha\beta\right]$ –  Impossibear Jan 22 '13 at 15:33
    
and $1/\sqrt{3}\psi_2' = 1/\sqrt{3}\left[1/2\left(\alpha\beta\gamma+\beta\alpha\gamma+\gamma\beta\alpha+ \gamma \alpha\beta\right)-\alpha\gamma\beta-\beta\gamma\alpha\right]$ –  Impossibear Jan 22 '13 at 15:34
    
There are also two more orthonormal wave functions, which are mixed antisymmetric under exchange of $\alpha$ and $\beta$. These four mixed (anti)symmetric wave functions must have either $L_{tot}=2$ or $L_{tot}=1$, it seems. They must be multiplied by the appropriate mixed (anti)symmetric spin wave functions to eventually form fully antisymmetric total wave functions corresponding to all of the $j=5/2$ states, and most of the $j=3/2$ states. –  Impossibear Jan 22 '13 at 15:38
    
Another way to think of it, is that, for three spin $1/2$ particles, the two mixed symmetric spin wave functions are the following: $|1/2,-1/2\rangle = -1/\sqrt{6}\left(2\Downarrow\Downarrow\Uparrow-\Uparrow\Downarrow\Downarrow-\Dow‌​narrow \Uparrow\Downarrow \right)$ $|1/2,1/2\rangle = 1/\sqrt{6}\left(2\Uparrow\Uparrow\Downarrow-\Uparrow\Downarrow\Uparrow-\Downarro‌​w \Uparrow\Uparrow \right)$ –  Impossibear Jan 22 '13 at 15:49
show 8 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.