Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Apologies if this is stating the obvious, but I'm a non-physicist trying to understand Griffiths' discussion of the hydrogen atom in chapter 4 of Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. The wave equation for the ground state (I believe) is:$$\psi=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi a^{3}}}e^{-r/a}$$

where $a$ is the Bohr radius $0.529\times10^{-10}$m. If I integrate the square of this equation between $r=0$ and $r=x$, am I right in assuming I am calculating the probability of finding the electron in a sphere radius $x$? I've done this for $x=1\textrm{ m}$ and $x=\infty$ and got the answer $1$ (I guess a two metre diameter sphere is pretty big compared to a hydrogen atom). For $x=9\times10^{-11}\textrm{ m}$, the answer is $0.66077$. Is this interpretation correct?

share|cite|improve this question
Relevant -… – Kitchi Jan 21 '13 at 19:41
You're interpretation is exactly right. The integral of $|\psi (x)|^2$ from $0$ to $x$ will give you the probability that the particle is in that region.The reason you get a probability of $1$ is because $a$ is really really small, so the exponential falls of quite quickly. If you calculate with enough precision, you'll find the answer to be just slightly less that one. – Kitchi Jan 21 '13 at 19:44
up vote 6 down vote accepted

No, you are wrong. Particular for the following statement:

If I integrate the square of this equation between $r=0$ and $r=x$, am I right in assuming I am calculating the probability of finding the electron in a sphere radius x?

The probability density at any points is given by $|\psi(r,\theta,\phi)|^2$. Certainly, the probability is for any region $V$ is given by $$P=\int_V|\psi|^2 dxdydz$$ However, if you are considering a sphere of radius $R$, you should change the integral into the spherical coordinate using the relation $dxdydz=r^2 \sin(\theta)drd\theta d\phi$ as follow $$P(R)=\int_V|\psi|^2 dxdydz=\int_0^R \int_0^\pi \int_0^{2\pi} |\psi|^2 r^2 \sin(\theta) dr d\theta d\phi = 4\pi \int_0^R r^2|\psi|^2 dr$$ Note that there is an extra $r^2$ in the equation and an extra constant $4 \pi$. Simply integrate the $|\psi|^2$ from $0$ to $R$ is wrong. It is very easy to check that this integral lead to the normalization condition of the wavefunction, i.e. $P(R\to\infty)=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
From his question it is not clear whether he integrates over the volume $dV$ or over the radius $dr$. We suppose he does it correctly, following the textbook. – Vladimir Kalitvianski Jan 22 '13 at 10:02
I cut a few corners in my question and have now been found out. My original calculation of the probability $P$ of finding the electron in a sphere radius $x$ was along the lines of $$P=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{x}\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi a^{3}}}e^{-r/a}\right|^{2}\left(r^{2}\sin\theta drd\theta d\phi\right)=\frac{4\pi}{\pi a^{3}}\int_{0}^{x}r^{2}e^{-2r/a}dr.$$ continued ... – Peter4075 Jan 22 '13 at 10:36
The $\pi$ 's cancelled, so I didn't mention them. Nor did I mention that I meant the complex square of the wave function. If $x=\infty$ then $P=1$, and if $x=0.00000000009$ then $P=0.66077$. I now know my interpretation was right, but my maths was a bit ragged. Thanks. – Peter4075 Jan 22 '13 at 10:38
@Peter4075 Remember to mention the unit you use, it would be make things clear :) – hwlau Jan 22 '13 at 16:36
Detail is important, that's what science is about. The need for angular integration is shown in the normalisation constant of the wavefunction. This is why I gave you +1. – JKL Feb 3 '13 at 0:51

Yes, you are practically right. The only subtlety is that your wave function argument $\mathbf{r}$ is a relative distance between the nucleus and the electron. Nucleus itself "turns around" the atomic center of mass, but with a shorter radius $(m_e/M_N)\cdot a$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Well actually you should integrate $|\psi|^2$, not $\psi$. – Bzazz Jan 21 '13 at 22:42
@Bzazz: In the original post he integrates a square because $\psi$ is real function in his case. – Vladimir Kalitvianski Jan 22 '13 at 8:15

In my opinion, if you want to know the probability of a particle being in a sphere, there should be an integration over a sphere, therefore I would add an additional factor of $4\pi$.

The thing I don't understand is the normalization of the wave function, it doesn't yield 1 if I integrate it over whole space.

My last issue is just a small one, I wouldn't call this a wave equation, it is already a wave function, the corresponding wave equation is the Schrödinger equation.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.