Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When I took my first thermo class a tucked away chapter introduced Exergy in terms of electrical energy, meaning that the amount of electrical energy you could get from something is functionally its exergy. Wikipedia doesn't go so far, but this has bothered me for years.

Forms of energy such as macroscopic kinetic energy, electrical energy, and chemical Gibbs free energy are 100% recoverable as work, and therefore have an exergy equal to their energy. However, forms of energy such as radiation and thermal energy can not be converted completely to work, and have exergy content less than their energy content.

Let's say that we have 1 Volt of potential. The smallest unit of energy we could isolate from this would be a single electron accelerated over the potential. Numerically and naively I could write:

$$ 2/3 k T = V e$$

Where $e$ is the electron charge. Doing this I would get something like $17,000 K$ for the temperature. This is high enough to approximate to infinity for conversion processes where your sink is room temperature.

I can imagine accelerating something with a greater charge than electron over that potential. This method would find a higher temperature, which presents a counter-argument. So what is it, is there a theoretical limit to the energy you can get from electricity, giving it a functional temperature? That would imply an unavoidable loss from DC-DC voltage converters.

Another thing that bothers me is saying that radiation can't be converted completely to work. Thermal radiation, yes, but most nuclear radiation is at $keV$ or $MeV$ energies, which would give a dramatically higher temperature than electrical energy (if I've understood correctly).

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The $3/2kT$ is the expectation value of kinetic energy of non-interacting particles in thermodynamic equilibrium, i.e., particles with random velocities in an equilibrium probability distribution. It does not apply to convective "bulk flow" of electrons in an electric field, where in the ideal case all electrons are at the same velocity.

Now there is such a thing as equilibrium electronic temperature. This is temperature of an equilibrium distribution electrons. For examples, the conduction bad electrons in a solid under zero potential. That is an equilibrium condition not a non-equilibrium bulk flow situation.

Ideally bulk flows due to conservative fields have no entropy, and their exergy equals energy. The best way to think about it, is consider you flow to be made of classical particles that all get accelerated the same way when imposed to a macroscopic potential energy gradient. The entropy comes when these particles collide with each other and develop different velocities (i.e., scramble). This is what happens in a real system, e.g., wind flowing due to some pressure gradient. Entropy is generated due to viscous dissipation of kinetic energy while flowing. But exergy is defined as the maximum -reversible work you can get and that is the same as the kinetic energy for a bulk flow, i.e., 100%.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.