Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was thinking about Fourier's Law in heat transfer today and for some reason I am just not understanding the relationships it gives us. Fourier's tells us that if the heat transfer rate is kept constant, then a larger thermal conductivity provides a smaller temperature gradient.

I am confused about the physical reason behind this or I am just misunderstanding the definition of thermal conductivity.

I thought that since thermal conductivity is ease of heat transfer through a material then a high thermal conductivity would mean heat is easily transferred so one side of the material is at a much temperature than the other and a large temperature gradient is created. In fact, this is actually the opposite

share|cite|improve this question

It's exactly the analog of electric resistance. A low resistance junction has a small voltage difference, a high resistance means you get a high potential difference for the same current

share|cite|improve this answer
The analogy with electric resistance is correct. Consider two wires of exactly the same dimensions, one made of Silver and the other made of Iron. Silver has a lower resistivity tha – don_Gunner94 Mar 9 at 6:56

Think of it this way: In the middle of a cold winter, when you want to keep a large gradient between the outside world and the inside of your home, would you go for a high or a low thermal conductivity material for the walls?

share|cite|improve this answer

The heat flux $Q [W/m^2]$ is determined via the temperature gradient and heat conductivity coefficient $\lambda$ like this:$$Q=\lambda\cdot(T_2-T_1)/L.$$ If you keep the temperature difference constant, it is the flux that increases with increasing $\lambda$. It is possible in case two liquids with high velocities are separated with a solid heat-conducting layer.

If you keep the flux constant, then there is no need in large temperature difference to provide it because high conductivity decreases the heat resistance of the material. The heat resistance is proportional to $1/\lambda$. Such a situation is possible when a heat source of a given power is cooled from exterior. The higher conductivity of its insulator, the colder is the source with respect to the exterior temperature.

share|cite|improve this answer

Let's look at Fourier's law:

$$\vec q = -k \nabla T$$

So from basic dimensional analysis assuming we know the heat flux and the distance over which the gradient occurs, if the thermal conductivity is large, then the temperature difference should be small.

share|cite|improve this answer

Flux=-k*dT/dx, Now rearrange this to dT/dx=Flux/-k. Make the connection that this equals slope of the temperature distribution. We have Flux/-k = slope of line. From this relationship we can see that increasing k decreases the slope of the line. BIG SLOPE * little k is similar to BIG K * little slope...get it???

share|cite|improve this answer

protected by Qmechanic Mar 9 at 6:10

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.