Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the early days of quantum electrodynamics, the most popular gauge chosen was the Gupta-Bleuler gauge stating that for physical states, $$\langle \chi | \partial^\mu A_\mu | \psi \rangle = 0.$$

However, this gauge is practically never used now. Why? Is there anything wrong or inappropriate with the Gupta-Bleuler gauge?

How is the Gupta-Bleuler gauge related to the $R_\xi$ gauge?

share|cite|improve this question
I think that you've got to emphasize that the gauge is not the same as $\partial^\mu A_\mu=0$. Link to wikipedia will do. – Kostya Feb 10 '11 at 9:27


The short summary version:

The Gupta-Bleuler gauge (Lorentz), like many others (Coulomb), works fine for QED, but is technically challenging/impossible to push to the non-Abelian case (of Yang-Mills theory). The modern view point is via something called the BRST transform, which is capable of dealing with the full general case.

share|cite|improve this answer
Just a few comments: the Gupta-Bleuler gauge is easy to impose in electrodynamics: negative frequencies are treated one way, positive ones in the other way. The field is linear and has no self-interactions. The latter condition is not satisfied for SU(2) and SU(3) gauge fields that are equally important in the Standard Model. So there's no simple variation of the Gupta-Bleuler method there, and one must use a more powerful method, e.g. BRST quantization, and then there's no reason not to treat the photons in the same logical way. Gupta-Bleuler is just obsolete. – Luboš Motl Feb 10 '11 at 13:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.